Vapor Recovery Unit Control for Terminal Loading Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Terminal loading capacity is limited by the vapor recovery unit (VRU) capacity, leading to undesirable shutdowns due to inefficient regeneration and saturation, straining the VRU's ability to handle increased loads.

Innovation Solution

Real-time monitoring and coordination of load rack and VRU operations using data processors and controllers to adjust fuel flow rates based on ambient temperature, product type, and VRU performance, ensuring the VRU remains within its capacity and preventing shutdowns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the terminal operates at full capacity, then the loading productivity increases, but the VRU becomes saturated and shuts down causing operational interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal loading capacityVSAvoidVRU continuous operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors VRU performance parameters (adsorber saturation levels, cycle timing, vacuum pump operation) and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust fuel dispensing rates. When the VRU shows signs of approaching saturation or regeneration delays, the system automatically reduces the loading rate to prevent shutdown, ensuring continuous reliable operation while maximizing productivity within VRU capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel dispensing rate is made dynamic rather than fixed. The system adjusts the loading rate in real-time based on VRU operational state, allowing higher rates when the VRU is operating efficiently and reducing rates when regeneration is delayed or adsorbers are near saturation. This dynamic adjustment optimizes productivity while preventing the binary shutdown state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If the VRU processes vapors at high rates, then the loading speed increases, but the adsorbers cannot regenerate quickly enough causing saturation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel loading rateVSAvoidregeneration time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors VRU cycle timing and adsorber saturation levels in advance to predict when regeneration will be insufficient. By detecting early signs of imbalance between vapor processing rate and regeneration rate, the system proactively reduces the loading rate before saturation occurs, preventing shutdown rather than reacting after the problem manifests

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies a counteracting reduction in fuel loading rate when VRU performance indicators suggest that vapor processing is outpacing regeneration capability. This preliminary anti-action prevents the harmful effect of saturation by reducing the vapor generation rate at the source (fuel dispensing) before the VRU becomes overwhelmed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Maximizes terminal loading capacity by optimizing fuel flow rates, preventing VRU shutdowns and allowing continuous fuel dispensing by maintaining the VRU within its operational limits.

Implementation Method 1

A typical VRU unit has at least two adsorber vessels filled with adsorbent, such as activated carbon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

The fuel vapor is commonly removed by vacuum and purge air stripping. A vacuum pump extracts the fuel vapor from the saturated adsorbent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 3

The absorption column vessel contains a packing material to increase the efficiency of the absorption process. The fuel vapors from the adsorber flow up through the absorption column while liquid fuel flows down through the packing. The liquid fuel absorbs the vapors retained in the packing.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS9597628B2Optimization of a vapor recovery unit
Publication Date: 2017.03.21 MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP
  • US9597628B2 patent drawing
  • US9597628B2 patent drawing
  • US9597628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This vapor control logic system is for optimizing terminal loading capacity by controlling load rack fuel dispensing with a vapor recovery unit (VRU) to prevent undesirable shutdown of fuel dispensing at terminal facilities.