Vaporiser Case With Spring Lift, Auto Refill, and Charging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional refillable e-cigarettes have complex user interactions that deviate from the simplicity of smoking a conventional cigarette, making them less appealing to smokers and hindering their mass-market adoption as a smoking cessation tool.

Innovation Solution

A case for an electronic cigarette vaporiser with an automatic lifting mechanism and integrated e-liquid refilling and battery charging, mimicking the form factor and rituals of a conventional cigarette, featuring a spring-based ejection and a compact design with a hinged PV holder.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional refillable e-cigarettes are designed with manual refilling mechanisms, then users can refill e-liquid, but the user interaction becomes complex and deviates from the simplicity of smoking conventional cigarettes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefilling capabilityVSAvoiduser interaction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device automatically refills e-liquid using an integrated pump system that transfers liquid from a reservoir to the atomizer without user intervention. The system self-regulates the refilling process, eliminating the need for manual user actions while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple functions (e-liquid storage, pumping, atomization, and battery charging) into a single integrated device. This merging of functions allows automatic refilling while simplifying user interaction, as the user only needs to fill the reservoir once rather than manually refilling the atomizer repeatedly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If e-cigarettes are designed with simple user interaction to replicate cigarette rituals, then appeal to smokers increases, but functionality for refilling and recharging becomes limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction simplicityVSAvoidrefilling and recharging functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device merges automatic e-liquid refilling and battery recharging functions into a single automated system. When the device is placed in its dock, both the pump transfers e-liquid and the battery charges simultaneously, maintaining simplicity while enhancing functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs both refilling and recharging operations automatically without requiring user actions beyond placing the device in the dock. The pump system and charging circuitry self-regulate their operations, preserving ease of use while providing comprehensive functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If automatic lifting mechanism is added to enable easy grasping of vaporiser, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaporiser extraction easeVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting mechanism uses a spring-loaded counterweight system that automatically propels the vaporiser upward when released. This mechanical counterweight approach provides automatic lifting without requiring complex electronic controls or motors, thus improving ease of operation while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring mechanism automatically lifts the vaporiser from the dock without requiring user intervention. The stored mechanical energy in the spring self-regulates the lifting motion, providing ease of extraction while keeping the mechanism simple and reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a user-friendly, intuitive vaping experience that replicates the simplicity of smoking, enhancing the appeal to smokers and facilitating effective nicotine reduction by regulating consumption through LED indicators, while ensuring compliance with safety regulations and minimizing leakage risks.

Implementation Method 1

The lifting mechanism can be spring-based

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring mechanism: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS20250234920A1Electronic vaporiser system
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 AYR LTD
  • US20250234920A1 patent drawing
  • US20250234920A1 patent drawing
  • US20250234920A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A case for an electronic cigarette vaporiser, the case including an automatic lifting mechanism that lifts the vaporiser up a few mm from the case to enable a user to easily grasp the vaporiser and withdraw it from the case. The lifting mechanism can be spring-based. The case both re-fills the vaporiser with liquid and also re-charges a battery in the vaporiser.