Vaporizer System Sonic Flow Restrictor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor processing tools face challenges in maintaining a consistent vaporized reactant flow rate due to pressure fluctuations and varying reactant evaporation rates, which affect the efficiency and stability of vapor delivery systems.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a vaporizer system that includes a sonic flow restrictor and a dilution gas inlet downstream of the ampoule, with a controller regulating the carrier and dilution gas flow to maintain a constant combined flow rate, and adjusting temperature and gas flow ratios based on pressure and evaporation rate measurements to ensure stable vaporization and delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a vaporizer system uses a simple ampoule with carrier gas inlet, then the device complexity is low, but the vapor delivery rate is unstable due to pressure fluctuations and varying reactant evaporation rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevapor delivery rate stabilityVSAvoidvaporizer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A sonic flow restrictor is introduced as an intermediary component between the ampoule and the downstream system. This restrictor creates a choked flow condition that decouples the vaporizer from downstream pressure fluctuations, acting as a mediator that stabilizes the vapor delivery rate regardless of variations in reactant evaporation or downstream pressure changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates pressure sensors and flow controllers that continuously monitor the vapor delivery process and provide feedback to the control system. Based on this feedback, the controller adjusts the carrier gas flow rate and ampoule temperature to maintain a constant vapor delivery rate, compensating for changes in reactant surface area and evaporation rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the vaporizer operates with varying reactant evaporation rates, then the adaptability to different reactant conditions is improved, but the vapor delivery rate consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactant condition adaptabilityVSAvoidvapor delivery consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic control mechanisms including adjustable ampoule temperature and variable carrier gas flow rates, both controlled by feedback from pressure sensors. These dynamic adjustments allow the system to adapt to different reactant conditions and evaporation rates while maintaining consistent vapor delivery, rather than operating at fixed conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as ampoule temperature and carrier gas flow rate in response to monitored pressure and evaporation rate variations. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system maintains stable vapor delivery despite changes in reactant properties or surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If downstream pressure fluctuations occur, then the system responds to process conditions, but the vaporizer system is affected by these fluctuations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess responsivenessVSAvoidvapor delivery stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sonic flow restrictor serves as a protective intermediary that isolates the vaporizer system from downstream pressure fluctuations. By creating a choked flow condition at the restrictor, the system maintains stable vapor delivery regardless of downstream pressure changes, while still being able to respond to process conditions through controlled gas flow adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures a stable and adjustable vapor delivery rate, isolating the vaporizer system from downstream pressure fluctuations and maintaining consistent vaporization, even as reactant surface area and evaporation rates change, thereby enhancing the reliability and efficiency of semiconductor processing operations.

Implementation Method 1

The sonic flow restrictor may be sized such that carrier gas and vapor that are flowed through the first sonic flow restrictor during normal operating conditions of the semiconductor processing tool experience choked flow.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSonic flow / Choked flow: Speed of Sound

Implementation Method 2

a first ampoule configured to receive a first quantity of reactant within a first interior volume of the first ampoule

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS10087523B2Vapor delivery method and apparatus for solid and liquid precursors
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 LAM RES CORP
  • US10087523B2 patent drawing
  • US10087523B2 patent drawing
  • US10087523B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vaporizer system is provided that allows for rapid shifts in the flow rate of a vaporized reactant while maintaining a constant overall flow rate of vaporized reactant and carrier gas.