Margin Requirement Calculation Using Value-at-Risk Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing SPAN-based system for calculating performance bond requirements is inadequate for complex and exotic financial instruments, as it misrepresents risk and struggles to accommodate intra and inter-commodity, calendar, and exchange positions, leading to inefficient margining and potential under or over-margination.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that uses Value-at-Risk (VAR) methodologies to determine risk exposure and establish performance bond requirements, comparing and adjusting SPAN-based margin requirements to provide a more accurate reflection of portfolio risk, allowing for credits or debits to margin accounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the SPAN system is used to calculate performance bond requirements, then the margining process is simplified and standardized, but the accuracy of risk assessment deteriorates for complex and exotic financial instruments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of margining processVSAvoidaccuracy of risk assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the margining process into two distinct components: the standardized SPAN calculation component and the VAR-based risk assessment component. This segmentation allows each component to excel at its specific function while working together to provide both ease of operation and accurate risk measurement for complex instruments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite margining approach by combining SPAN methodology with VAR (Value at Risk) methodology. This composite system integrates the standardized processing of SPAN with the sophisticated risk modeling of VAR, achieving both operational simplicity and measurement accuracy simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If the SPAN system applies credits using a tiered structure, then the calculation process becomes more systematic, but the representation of actual risk deteriorates due to rigid spreading rules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystematic calculation structureVSAvoidaccuracy of risk representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic risk assessment through VAR that adapts to the specific characteristics of each portfolio and market conditions, replacing the static tiered structure of SPAN. The VAR calculation dynamically adjusts credit allocations based on actual portfolio composition and market correlations rather than following rigid predetermined tiers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental parameters used for credit calculation from SPAN's scenario-based fixed parameters to VAR's statistical parameters including mean, variance, and correlation coefficients. This parameter transformation enables more accurate risk representation while maintaining systematic calculation through standardized statistical methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the SPAN system is used for traditional futures and options trading, then the margining process is efficient and straightforward, but the adaptability to exotic products and complex portfolios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of margining processVSAvoidaccommodation of exotic products
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the margining system universal by designing VAR to handle multiple product types including traditional futures, options, and exotic instruments through a single unified statistical framework. The VAR methodology can process any financial instrument that can be characterized by mean, variance, and correlation parameters, providing both efficiency and versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Stability of the object's composition

If the SPAN system spreads positions in a fixed sequence, then the calculation process is deterministic and reproducible, but the ability to capture true risk offsets deteriorates due to rigid spreading rules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeterministic calculation processVSAvoidaccuracy of risk offset capture
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the deterministic scenario-based parameters of SPAN into statistical parameters (mean, variance, correlation) used in VAR calculations. This parameter change enables the system to maintain reproducibility through standardized statistical methods while accurately capturing risk offsets through correlation-based relationships that adapt to actual portfolio composition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7813988B2Method and system for determining margin requirements
Publication Date: 2010.10.12 NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE
  • US7813988B2 patent drawing
  • US7813988B2 patent drawing
  • US7813988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides for a system and method of applying value-at-risk determination of a financial portfolio to a performance bond requirement and comparing the value-at-risk determination with a traditional scenario-based performance bond requirement.