VAR Pool Power Controller for Ingot Energy Flux

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current VAR controllers fail to effectively control the total energy flux into the top ingot surface during the vacuum arc remelting process, leading to variations in solidification rate and potential solidification defects due to unregulated arc power during transient melting conditions.

Innovation Solution

A pool power controller apparatus that regulates the total energy flux by controlling both arc power and melt power, using a nonlinear controller to adjust current and electrode drive speed based on equations derived from the VAR process dynamics, ensuring consistent pool power delivery to the ingot surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If current VAR controllers control only electrode gap and melt rate, then electrode consumption is regulated, but total energy flux to the ingot surface varies during transient melting conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precision of energy fluxVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements feedback control by continuously measuring actual pool power through sensors detecting arc voltage, current, and electrode consumption rate, then comparing this with the desired pool power setpoint to generate corrective control signals that adjust electrode feed rate and/or arc power, thereby maintaining precise control of total energy flux to the ingot surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically adjusts process parameters (electrode feed rate and arc power) based on real-time conditions during transient melting, transforming the control approach from static parameter setting to dynamic parameter adaptation, enabling precise control of total energy flux despite varying melting conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If arc power is not regulated during transient melting, then controller operation is simple, but solidification rate varies causing defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveingot qualityVSAvoidcontroller operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The controller uses feedback from sensors monitoring arc voltage, current, and electrode consumption to automatically detect transient melting conditions and adjust arc power and electrode feed rate accordingly, ensuring reliable control of solidification rate without requiring manual intervention or complex operator judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs self-regulation by automatically detecting its own operational state through embedded sensors and autonomously adjusting control parameters to maintain desired pool power levels, eliminating the need for external monitoring or manual adjustment while ensuring consistent ingot quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If pool power control is implemented, then total energy flux is stabilized, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy flux stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller merges multiple control functions (electrode feed rate control, arc power control, and pool power regulation) into a single integrated control system that simultaneously manages all parameters to maintain stable total energy flux, reducing the need for separate control systems and simplifying overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller is designed as a multi-functional device that can operate in different modes (constant pool power mode, constant electrode feed rate mode, and transitional modes), adapting its control strategy based on process conditions while maintaining stable energy flux delivery to the ingot surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The controller maintains a consistent total energy flux to the ingot surface, reducing solidification defects and improving the quality of metal ingots by stabilizing the energy input, as demonstrated through successful testing on an existing VAR furnace.

Implementation Method 1

a direct current (dc) arc is struck between the electrode (cathode) and some start material (e.g., metal chips) at the bottom of the crucible (anode). The arc heats both the start material and the electrode tip, eventually melting both.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectArc heating: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 2

a water-cooled, copper crucible

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS10422584B2Apparatus to control the total energy flux into the top ingot surface during vacuum arc remelting processes
Publication Date: 2019.09.24 SPECIALTY METALS PROCESSING CONSORTIUM
  • US10422584B2 patent drawing
  • US10422584B2 patent drawing
  • US10422584B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Vacuum Arc Remelting controller apparatus wherein process control is accomplished primarily through control of pool power. Pool power being defined as the total energy flux into a top ingot surface of the VAR ingot. The controller apparatus of the present invention comprises a controller computer that transmits commands to the host furnace through an ethernet connection.