Variable Airfoils for Stunt Flight Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current airfoils are limited in their performance across low-speed and high-speed flight conditions, particularly lacking stability and aerobatic capacity, with existing designs sensitive to surface roughness and inefficient at handling varying Reynolds numbers.

Innovation Solution

Design of airfoils jn1431-265 and jn1413-362, which adjust lift coefficients based on angle of attack and Reynolds number, combining to provide improved stability, efficiency, and predictable stall characteristics, reducing the need for high-lift devices like flaps or slats, and enhancing performance in inverted flight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If airfoils are designed for high lift coefficients at low speeds, then takeoff and landing performance is improved, but the airfoils become sensitive to surface roughness and ineffective at high speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift coefficientVSAvoidspeed range adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by designing airfoils with specific geometric parameters (camber, thickness distribution, leading edge radius) that optimize performance across varying Reynolds numbers. The airfoil shapes are specifically configured to maintain stable boundary layer transition and predictable stall characteristics across the full speed range from low-speed takeoff/landing to high-speed cruise flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If airfoils are designed for high speed stability, then cruise performance is improved, but low-speed lift capacity and inverted flight capability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh speed stabilityVSAvoidaerobatic capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different airfoil sections along the wingspan, with varying camber and thickness ratios optimized for their specific locations. This allows the wing to exhibit stable high-speed characteristics at the root while maintaining better low-speed and inverted flight characteristics at the tips, achieving overall versatility across flight regimes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If single airfoil design is used for the wing, then manufacturing is simplified, but performance optimization across different flight conditions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewing construction simplicityVSAvoidflight performance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the wing into multiple sections along the span, each equipped with different airfoil profiles optimized for specific flight conditions. This segmentation allows each section to contribute differently to overall performance - improving low-speed lift, high-speed stability, and inverted flight capability - while maintaining reasonable manufacturing complexity through modular construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These airfoils achieve up to 30% improved wing efficiency, stability at high speeds, and safer takeoffs and landings by dynamically adjusting aerodynamics with speed, allowing for more flexible flight conditions and increased capacity for inverted flight.

Implementation Method 1

airfoils are developed in accordance with specific purposes of flight (of speed, for gliding, acrobatic, etc.)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBernoulli principle: Bernoulli Effect

Implementation Method 2

the transition to turbulent flow occurring near the leading edge at high lift coefficients

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer transition: Boundary Layer

Implementation Method 3

low drag and lower lift coefficients at higher speeds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10850827B2Airfoils for stunt flights
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 NARVAEZ TIJERINA JUAN GERARDO
  • US10850827B2 patent drawing
  • US10850827B2 patent drawing
  • US10850827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to airfoils, called jn1431-265 and 1413-362, which operate intelligently by adjusting the variable aerodynamics thereof, not only through the attack and sine angle, but also through the effect of scale (air speed), which, when combined, improve the efficiency of the wings configured therewith by up to 30%, cause the wings to experience a predictable stall and also rapidly recover therefrom, and also making the wings configured therewith more efficient at low speed, which reduces the need to use flaps or slats (“high lift devices”), and, in the event that flaps or slats are used, increase the effect of said airfoils even more. On the other hand, at an increased speed, the aerodynamic variables also adjust by up to a third of the value thereof (the angle of attack remaining unchanged), causing the wing to also be very stable at high speed conditions.