Variable Beam Geometry in Powder Bed Fusion to Limit Vaporization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Powder-bed fusion (PBF) systems, particularly laser PBF, face challenges with slow processing times and material vaporization, limiting their efficiency and cost-effectiveness for high-capacity production of complex geometries.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus with a beam shaping applicator that dynamically adjusts the energy beam geometry based on the additive manufacturing environment, allowing for variable beam geometries such as circles, ellipses, or ovals, to compensate for distortions and control power density, thereby optimizing the energy beam's shape and application for more efficient fusion of metal powders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-power laser systems are used to increase processing speed, then productivity is improved, but material vaporization increases causing harmful effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmaterial vaporization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting beam geometry parameters (shape, size, distribution) and process parameters (power, speed, hatching patterns) to optimize the balance between processing speed and vaporization control. Different beam geometries are selected based on material properties, layer thickness, and desired outcomes to prevent vaporization while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics through real-time adaptation of beam geometry and scanning patterns during the additive manufacturing process. The beam shaping applicator dynamically modifies beam parameters based on feedback from sensors and process conditions, allowing the system to respond to varying material properties and thermal states to prevent vaporization while maintaining high processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If conventional laser PBF processes are used, then manufacturing capability is maintained, but processing time is excessive reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple beam functions into a single adaptable beam system. By combining heating, melting, and selective fusion capabilities into one dynamically controllable beam geometry system, the process eliminates the need for multiple separate operations or parameter adjustments, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining manufacturing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves reduced processing time through parameter changes by optimizing beam geometry parameters for different manufacturing stages and material properties. Adaptive adjustment of beam shape, size, and power distribution allows faster processing speeds without sacrificing build quality, directly addressing the productivity-time contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If fixed beam geometry is used, then system complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to compensate for distortions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy and circularityVSAvoidbeam shaping system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The beam shaping applicator implements dynamics by transitioning from fixed to variable beam geometry. The system dynamically adjusts beam shape and size parameters in real-time based on the additive manufacturing environment, allowing compensation for thermal distortions and geometric inaccuracies while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies feedback by using sensors to monitor the additive manufacturing process conditions and feeding this information back to the beam shaping applicator. This closed-loop control enables automatic adjustment of beam geometry to compensate for distortions and maintain manufacturing precision without requiring overly complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If high power density is applied to increase fusion speed, then productivity is improved, but thermal stresses increase causing harmful effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion speedVSAvoidthermal stresses
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction through parameter changes by dynamically adjusting beam geometry parameters (shape, size, power distribution) to optimize the power density profile. By varying beam geometry rather than simply increasing power, the system achieves faster fusion speeds while distributing thermal loads more evenly to reduce thermal stresses and their harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the throughput of the PBF process, reduces material vaporization, and improves the accuracy and circularity of microtubes, enabling the production of complex geometries with better precision and reduced thermal stresses.

Implementation Method 1

a beam shaping applicator configured to shape the energy beam into a geometry and apply the shaped energy beam to an additive manufacturing material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical focusing: Focusing

Implementation Method 2

the beam shaping applicator including a deflector configured to control a direction at which the shaped energy beam is applied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLens focusing: Lens

Implementation Method 3

Laser PBF (L-PBF) may be useful for manufacturing complex geometries

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 4

fusing (e.g., melting and cooling) areas of the metal powder layer that coincide with the cross-section of the build piece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 5

the beam shaping applicator comprising a fixed optical element and a movable optical element aligned to encompass the energy beam, at least one of the optical elements comprising a lens

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 6

the beam shaping applicator further comprising at least a beam expander, a diffractive beam splitter, a diffractive diffuser, a distortion compensator, an F-theta lens, a phase plate, or a mirror

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20220297233A1Variable beam geometry energy beam-based powder bed fusion
Publication Date: 2022.09.22 DIVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20220297233A1 patent drawing
  • US20220297233A1 patent drawing
  • US20220297233A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses for additive manufacturing producing an annular beam are disclosed herein. An apparatus in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure comprises an energy beam source configured to generate an energy beam and a beam shaping applicator configured to shape the energy beam into a geometry and apply the shaped energy beam to an additive manufacturing material, wherein the geometry includes a two-dimensional shape with a perimeter and a hole in the two-dimensional shape within the perimeter.