Variable Geometry Turbomachine Blade Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing turbomachine blades face challenges in maintaining optimal aerodynamic shape and efficiency at varying speeds due to increasing centrifugal forces, friction, vibrations, and flow resistance, which affect fluid flow guidance and energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

The blade is designed with different material areas of varying elasticity, allowing it to change shape in response to speed, with specific material properties and arrangements optimizing its aerodynamic shape by altering the angle of attack and curvature, thus adapting to speed-dependent conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the blade is made of uniform material with fixed geometry, then the manufacturing is simple and cost-effective, but the blade cannot adapt to varying speed conditions and maintains optimal aerodynamic shape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to speed conditionsVSAvoidblade structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is divided into multiple blade regions with different material properties. Each region can deform independently in response to centrifugal forces at different speeds, allowing the blade to adapt its overall geometry without requiring a completely complex adjustable mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different blade regions are assigned different material properties (elastic vs. rigid characteristics) to enable localized deformation. This allows specific portions of the blade to change shape in response to speed variations while other portions maintain their structural integrity, achieving adaptability without uniform complexity throughout the entire blade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the blade geometry is fixed, then the structural integrity is maintained across all speeds, but the aerodynamic efficiency deteriorates at varying speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The blade transitions from a static, fixed geometry design to a dynamic design where the blade geometry automatically changes in response to operating conditions (rotational speed). The elastic blade regions deform under centrifugal force to optimize aerodynamic shape at different speeds while the rigid regions maintain structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The physical state of the blade regions changes based on rotational speed. At lower speeds, the elastic regions remain relatively straight, while at higher speeds, they deform to optimized angles due to centrifugal forces. This parameter change (geometry) is directly tied to the operating condition (speed) to maintain aerodynamic efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the blade is designed to be elastically deformable, then the blade can adapt to speed variations, but the manufacturing precision and control of blade geometry become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed-dependent shape adaptationVSAvoidblade geometry control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Within each blade region, homogeneous material properties are used to ensure predictable and uniform deformation behavior. This allows the design to achieve the desired overall geometric control through the arrangement of regions rather than through complex variations within each region, simplifying manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

4Productivity

If the blade uses different materials with different elasticities, then the aerodynamic shape can be optimized at varying speeds, but the manufacturing complexity and material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidblade manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The blade uses composite construction with multiple materials having different elastic properties arranged in specific regions. This allows the blade to exhibit desired deformation characteristics under centrifugal force while potentially using manufacturing techniques like layered composite fabrication that can integrate multiple materials in a single production process, balancing manufacturing ease with performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables the blade to maintain an optimal fluid flow shape and efficiency across different speed ranges, reducing energy consumption and noise while enhancing the blade's structural integrity.

Implementation Method 1

the blade is designed to be elastically deformable depending on the speed of the impeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

With increasing rotational speed or speed, the forces acting on the blade increase: centrifugal forces, friction, vibrations and flow resistance increase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP3172447B1Blade for an impeller
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 EBM PAPST MULFINGEN GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3172447B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3172447B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3172447B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a blade (30) for an impeller (20) of an independently driven turbomachine, in particular for a fan; the blade, which is operatively connected to a hub (40) of the impeller (20), can be driven at variable speeds and is elastically deformable in accordance with the speed of the impeller (20), the blade (30) having a first blade geometry in a first speed range and a second blade geometry in a second speed range, the blade (30) taking a predetermined fluidically relevant shape in accordance with the impeller speed.