Variable Checkpointing in Streaming Applications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Checkpointing in streaming applications often negatively impacts performance due to rigid time intervals, especially when spikes or backpressure occur in consistent regions, leading to performance penalties.

Innovation Solution

A variable checkpoint mechanism that adjusts checkpoint timing based on predicted spikes and actual backpressure conditions, allowing checkpoints to be taken before or after the normal periodic time period, minimizing performance impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If periodic checkpointing is performed at fixed time intervals, then the streaming application can restore state after failure, but the performance of the streaming application is negatively affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate restoration capabilityVSAvoidstreaming application performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a variable checkpoint mechanism that dynamically adjusts checkpoint timing based on real-time system conditions. Instead of using fixed periodic intervals, the system monitors metrics such as backpressure in consistent regions and data tuple processing rates, then adapts checkpoint scheduling accordingly. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain reliability while minimizing performance impact by performing checkpoints only when system conditions are favorable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of checkpoint timing from a fixed periodic value to a variable value based on system conditions. The checkpoint interval is adjusted according to monitored parameters including backpressure levels, data tuple arrival rates, and processing throughput. This parameter change enables the system to optimize the trade-off between reliability and performance by performing checkpoints at intervals that adapt to current system state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a checkpoint is forced during backpressure in a consistent region, then the checkpoint can be taken, but significant performance penalties occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheckpoint completionVSAvoiddata processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors backpressure conditions in consistent regions of the streaming application. The system uses this feedback information to make informed decisions about checkpoint scheduling. When backpressure is detected, the system delays checkpoint execution until conditions improve, preventing performance penalties. This feedback loop ensures that checkpoints are only performed when they will not significantly impact data processing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary assessment of system conditions before initiating a checkpoint. The variable checkpoint mechanism evaluates current backpressure levels, processing rates, and queue depths before committing to a checkpoint operation. This preliminary action allows the system to avoid initiating checkpoints during periods of high backpressure, thereby preventing the performance penalties that would otherwise occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If incremental delta checkpoints are used instead of full periodic checkpoints, then the performance impact is reduced, but the complexity of checkpoint management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheckpoint performance impactVSAvoidcheckpoint management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the checkpoint process into incremental delta checkpoints that capture only the changes since the last checkpoint. This segmentation allows the system to perform multiple small checkpoint operations instead of single large checkpoint operations, reducing the performance impact of each individual checkpoint. The delta checkpoint approach divides the state capture task into manageable increments that can be performed efficiently with minimal disruption to the streaming application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10671490B2Variable checkpointing in a streaming application with one or more consistent regions
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10671490B2 patent drawing
  • US10671490B2 patent drawing
  • US10671490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variable checkpoint mechanism in a streams manager checkpoints a streaming application based on periodic time periods for checkpoints. The variable checkpoint mechanism can take a checkpoint before a periodic time period ends when a spike is coming, or can take a checkpoint after the periodic time period ends when there is backpressure in a consistent region of the streaming application. When there is no anticipated spike coming and when there is no backpressure in a consistent region of the streaming application, the checkpoint is performed at the normal end of the periodic time period for checkpoints. In this manner the checkpoint timing of the variable checkpoint mechanism can be adjusted real-time to minimize the negative impact of checkpointing on the performance of the streaming application.