Variable Checkpointing in Streaming Applications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Checkpointing in streaming applications with tuple windows can significantly impact performance due to the overhead of processing large tuple windows, especially when checkpoints are forced at periodic time intervals, leading to negative performance penalties.

Innovation Solution

A variable checkpoint mechanism in a streams manager that adjusts the timing of checkpoints based on predicted tuple window sizes and storage requirements, allowing for early or late checkpointing within periodic time periods to minimize performance impact, using backpressure detection and historical performance logs to optimize checkpoint timing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If periodic checkpointing is performed at fixed time intervals, then the streaming application can maintain reliability through regular state saving, but the performance of the streaming application deteriorates due to the overhead of checkpointing large tuple windows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheckpointing reliabilityVSAvoidstreaming processing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from fixed periodic checkpointing to adaptive variable checkpointing. The system dynamically adjusts checkpoint timing based on predicted tuple window sizes, using historical performance logs and prediction models to determine optimal checkpoint moments that minimize performance impact while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses preliminary action by predicting future tuple window sizes before checkpoints occur. The system analyzes historical performance data and forecasts tuple window characteristics in advance, allowing it to proactively schedule checkpoints at optimal times before large windows form, thereby preventing performance degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If checkpointing is performed when tuple window size is large, then the checkpoint captures more complete state information, but the time and storage overhead increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate information completenessVSAvoidcheckpoint duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of tuple window sizes using historical performance logs and prediction models. By forecasting when tuple windows will be small, the system can proactively schedule checkpoints in advance during low-window periods, capturing necessary state information without incurring the overhead of checkpointing large windows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If the checkpoint time is fixed at periodic intervals, then the checkpointing process is simple to implement, but it cannot adapt to varying tuple window sizes and causes performance penalties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheckpointing implementation simplicityVSAvoidstreaming application performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by replacing static fixed-interval checkpointing with adaptive variable checkpointing. The system uses historical performance logs, prediction models, and multiple criteria evaluation to dynamically determine checkpoint timing, allowing it to adapt to varying tuple window sizes and minimize performance impact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring actual tuple window sizes and checkpoint performance. Historical performance logs capture past checkpoint outcomes, which feed into prediction models that refine future checkpoint timing decisions, creating a closed-loop system that learns from past performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10375137B2Variable checkpointing in a streaming application that includes tuple windows
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10375137B2 patent drawing
  • US10375137B2 patent drawing
  • US10375137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variable checkpoint mechanism in a streams manager checkpoints a streaming application based on periodic time periods for checkpoints. The variable checkpoint mechanism can take a checkpoint early before a periodic time period ends or late after the periodic time period ends based on predicted size of one or more tuple windows in the streaming application. The time for taking the checkpoint can be selected based on multiple checkpoint timing criteria, which include storage requirement for the checkpoint and predicted backpressure in the flow graph. In this manner the checkpoint timing of the variable checkpoint mechanism can be adjusted real-time to minimize the negative impact of checkpointing on the performance of the streaming application.