Variable Flight Control Sensitivity for Precise Vehicle Landing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

New types of vehicles, particularly single-seat aircraft, pose safety challenges for inexperienced pilots due to the difficulty of takeoffs and landings, as they require precise control and training that cannot be adequately supported by existing technologies without instructor intervention.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a variable sensitivity input device system that adjusts sensitivity levels based on the vehicle's region, using a first sensitivity level for landing zones to ensure slower speeds and a second sensitivity level for open areas, allowing pilots to fly at faster velocities, with switching initiated by a base station or automatically through geofencing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a fixed high sensitivity level is used for all flight regions, then the pilot can fly at fast velocities in open areas, but the pilot risks overshooting or missing landing zones and experiencing pilot-induced oscillations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight velocityVSAvoidlanding precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the sensitivity level of the flight control system based on the vehicle's current region. When the vehicle is detected to be in a landing zone (first region), the system automatically switches to a first sensitivity level that limits maximum velocity. When the vehicle is in open areas (second region), the system switches to a second sensitivity level that allows faster velocities. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the sensitivity parameter variable rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different sensitivity characteristics to different spatial regions. The first sensitivity level (for landing zones) has specific properties optimized for precision and safety, while the second sensitivity level (for open areas) has properties optimized for speed and performance. This local differentiation allows the system to have optimal characteristics for each specific operating context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a fixed low sensitivity level is used for all flight regions, then the pilot can safely operate near landing zones, but the pilot cannot achieve fast velocities in open areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding precisionVSAvoidflight velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the sensitivity parameter based on the vehicle's location. The flight control system monitors the vehicle's position and automatically adjusts the sensitivity level: using a first (lower) sensitivity level when in landing zones to ensure precision, and switching to a second (higher) sensitivity level when in open areas to enable faster flight. This resolves the contradiction by making sensitivity adaptive to operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different sensitivity characteristics are applied to different geographic regions. The system creates region-specific control characteristics where landing zones have optimized low-sensitivity settings for precision, while open areas have optimized high-sensitivity settings for speed, allowing each region to have its own optimal performance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If variable sensitivity levels are implemented based on region, then safety and precision are improved for inexperienced pilots, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control system automatically determines the vehicle's current region and selects the appropriate sensitivity level without requiring manual intervention from the pilot. The system self-manages the complexity of region detection and sensitivity switching, thereby improving safety while minimizing the operational burden on the pilot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the vehicle's position and uses this feedback to automatically adjust the sensitivity level. When the vehicle enters or exits a landing zone, the system detects this change and switches between sensitivity levels accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism automates the complexity management, improving safety without requiring the pilot to manually manage multiple sensitivity settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11550318B2Variable sensitivity input device for vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 KITTY HAWK CORP
  • US11550318B2 patent drawing
  • US11550318B2 patent drawing
  • US11550318B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first sensitivity level is used to interpret an input signal received from an input device in a vehicle while the vehicle is in a first region. A second sensitivity level is used to interpret the input signal received from the input device in the vehicle while the vehicle is in a second region, wherein the second sensitivity level is greater than the first sensitivity level.