Variable Counterweight for Engine Vibration Mitigation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Low cylinder count engines face significant challenges with noise vibration and harshness (NVH) issues due to high engine vibrations, which conventional vibration mitigation devices like dual mass flywheels and centrifugal pendulum vibration absorbers are unable to adequately address, limiting their deployment despite advantages such as reduced part count, lower cost, and higher efficiency.
Innovation Solution
A variable counterweight system comprising rotatable actuators and geometrically reconfigurable counterweights that adjust their center of gravity positions to counteract torque roll and engine vibrations, using a phaser system and linkages to vary the moment applied to mitigate NVH across different engine operating conditions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If conventional vibration mitigation devices (dual mass flywheels, centrifugal pendulum vibration absorbers) are used in low cylinder count engines, then device complexity is reduced and cost is lowered, but NVH performance deteriorates due to inadequate vibration mitigation
Solution Approach 1:
The counterweight system transitions from a fixed configuration to a dynamic, adjustable configuration. The counterweights can be repositioned along the crankshaft axis and rotated about their own axes, allowing the system to adapt to varying engine operating conditions and optimize vibration mitigation in real-time
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes physical parameters of the counterweights (position along the crankshaft axis, rotational angle about their own axes) to optimize vibration counterbalancing. By adjusting these parameters, the system can effectively counteract different vibration modes generated by low cylinder count engines under various operating conditions
2Productivity
If low cylinder count engines are deployed, then part count is reduced and mechanical efficiency is improved, but NVH performance deteriorates due to high engine vibrations
Solution Approach 1:
The counterweight system transitions from a fixed configuration to a dynamic, adjustable configuration. The counterweights can be repositioned along the crankshaft axis and rotated about their own axes, allowing the system to adapt to varying engine operating conditions and optimize vibration mitigation in real-time
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes physical parameters of the counterweights (position along the crankshaft axis, rotational angle about their own axes) to optimize vibration counterbalancing. By adjusting these parameters, the system can effectively counteract different vibration modes generated by low cylinder count engines under various operating conditions
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The system effectively reduces engine vibrations in low cylinder count engines and other configurations by dynamically adjusting the counterweight moments to match varying engine conditions, enhancing NVH mitigation and enabling wider deployment of these engines.
Implementation Method 1
a first counterweight rotatably coupled to the rotatable actuator to rotate about a first axis... a second counterweight rotatably coupled to the rotatable actuator to rotate about a second axis
Implementation Method 2
The first counterweight is configured to geometrically reconfigure so as to change a first counterweight center of gravity position with respect to the first counterweight
Data Source
AI summary
Variable counterweight apparatuses, systems and methods. The variable counterweight system includes at least one rotatable actuator, a first variable counterweight assembly, and a second variable counterweight assembly. The first variable counterweight assembly is rotatably coupled to the rotatable actuator to rotate about a first axis. The first variable counterweight assembly is configured to geometrically reconfigure so as to change a first variable counterweight assembly center of gravity position with respect to the first variable counterweight assembly. The second variable counterweight assembly is rotatably coupled to the rotatable actuator to rotate about a second axis. The second variable counterweight assembly is configured to geometrically reconfigure so as to change a second variable counterweight assembly center of gravity position with respect to the second variable counterweight assembly.


