Variable-Density Ceramic Hip Prostheses for Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ceramic hip prostheses face issues with wear debris and limited size applicability due to the use of polymer-based bearing inserts, which restrict their application to larger bone patients and do not allow for larger diameter heads in smaller patients.

Innovation Solution

The development of ceramic prostheses with a dense inner layer and a porous outer layer, manufactured using a multi-layer process involving isopressing and firing, to create a density gradient that mimics natural bone structures, allowing for secure affixation and reduced wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If polymer-based bearing inserts are used in ceramic hip prostheses, then wear resistance is improved, but adaptability to different patient sizes is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidapplicability to different patient sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis employs a density gradient structure where the inner region has high density for wear resistance and the outer region has low density for bone ingrowth, allowing the same component to serve multiple functional requirements and adapt to different patient anatomies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite ceramic structure with varying densities within a single monolithic component, combining the wear resistance of dense ceramic with the bone-integration capabilities of porous ceramic, eliminating the need for separate polymer inserts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If dense ceramic material is used throughout the prosthesis, then wear resistance is improved, but bone ingrowth capability is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidbone affixation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis features a spatially varying density structure where the inner portion maintains high density for wear resistance while the outer portion has reduced density to facilitate bone ingrowth, with the density transitioning gradually between these regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The outer region of the prosthesis incorporates a porous structure with controlled density (0.2-0.8 g/cc) that enables bone ingrowth and secure affixation to the patient's bone, while the inner region maintains high density for wear resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If polymer-based inserts are used to accommodate different patient sizes, then adaptability is improved, but wear debris generation is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize applicabilityVSAvoidwear debris
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite ceramic structure with density gradient to replace polymer-based inserts, achieving adaptability through varying density (0.2-2.5 g/cc) while eliminating polymer wear debris generation entirely

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The prosthesis achieves size adaptability by varying the density parameter of the ceramic material across different regions and potentially across different prosthesis sizes, allowing customization without using polymer materials that generate wear debris

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ceramic prostheses exhibit ultra-low wear and allow for the use of larger diameter heads in smaller patients by providing a secure bone ingrowth surface and a wear-resistant dense inner layer, addressing the limitations of traditional polymer-based inserts.

Implementation Method 1

one or more stages during which the dense inner layer(s) are partially compressed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The coating particles may be combined with the base portion in an isopress mold, after which a third isopressing process is performed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS9517136B2Variable-density implants and related methods and systems
Publication Date: 2016.12.13 SINTX TECH INC
  • US9517136B2 patent drawing
  • US9517136B2 patent drawing
  • US9517136B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Ceramic orthopedic implants may have one or more dense inner layers and one or more porous outer layers. Methods for manufacturing the implants may include one or more stages during which the dense inner layer(s) are partially compressed. At least one porous outer layer may include coating particles that are present at a surface of one or more inner layer(s) while pressure is applied to attach the coating particles to the inner layer(s) and to further compress one or more of the inner layer(s). Various layers may be formed until an implant, or other device, is formed having the desired density gradient and/or other properties, as disclosed herein.