Variable Dimension Poultry Feeder With Adjustable Chutes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional poultry feeders struggle to accommodate varying feed capacities for different ages of poultry and often result in feed spillage and waste, especially with fine-grain feeds.

Innovation Solution

A feeder design featuring adjustable, pivotable chutes that form a size-variable tray system with a feed hopper and a manual control system to manage feed capacity and prevent spillage, utilizing a unique lip and feed saving members to ensure efficient feed retention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the feeder uses a fixed-size tray, then the structure is simple, but it cannot accommodate different ages of poultry with varying feed capacities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed capacity adjustmentVSAvoidtray structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tray is divided into two separate chutes (first chute and second chute) that can move independently relative to each other. Each chute can be positioned at different angles to adjust the tray's capacity, allowing the feeder to accommodate different poultry ages without requiring a completely different tray structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chutes are designed to be movable rather than fixed, with the second chute capable of pivoting relative to the first chute. This dynamic structure allows the tray capacity to be adjusted by changing the relative position of the chutes, enabling adaptation to different feed requirements while maintaining a relatively simple base structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of substance

If the feeder uses a simple open tray design, then the structure is simple, but feed spills and seeps out especially with fine-grain feeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed spillageVSAvoidtray structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tray is segmented into two chutes with an interface between them. The first chute has a lip at its end edge that engages with the second chute, creating a sealed interface that prevents fine-grain feed from spilling through the junction while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chutes are designed with flexible or closely fitting surfaces that can conform to each other at the interface. The lip structure and engaging surfaces create a seal that prevents feed leakage without requiring rigid, complex sealing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Adaptability or versatility

If the chutes are fixed in position, then the structure is stable, but the feed capacity cannot be adjusted for different poultry ages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed capacityVSAvoid chute position
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The second chute is designed to pivot relative to the first chute around a fixed axis, allowing dynamic adjustment of the tray capacity while maintaining stable positioning during operation. The pivot mechanism enables easy reconfiguration without compromising the structural stability of the overall feeder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Only the second chute is made movable while the first chute remains fixed, providing a stable reference structure. This localized mobility allows feed capacity adjustment without making the entire structure unstable, maintaining overall compositional stability while enabling adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of substance

If the chutes overlap completely to maximize feed retention, then feed spillage is minimized, but the lower part of the receptacle cannot be accessed for cleaning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed retentionVSAvoidreceptacle cleaning
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The second chute can be pivoted to different positions, including a fully open position where it no longer overlaps with the first chute. This dynamic positioning allows the tray to be completely opened for cleaning and maintenance while maintaining full overlap capability for feed retention during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The chute overlap can be periodically adjusted between a closed position for feed retention and an open position for cleaning. This periodic switching between operational and maintenance states allows both feed retention and ease of cleaning to be achieved at different times in the operational cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11647734B2Variable dimension poultry feeder
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 BUTTERFLY CONCEPTS
  • US11647734B2 patent drawing
  • US11647734B2 patent drawing
  • US11647734B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A feed hopper with two chute members is provided. The chutes are movable with respect to one another and one chute has an extending lip to engage the inner surface of the other chute to prevent feed from escaping the hopper.