Variable EAS Detection Algorithm for High-Speed Passage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) systems fail to detect AM markers effectively when individuals pass through the surveillance zone at high speeds, as the detection process requires a fixed time duration that exceeds the time spent by fast-moving individuals, leading to missed detections.

Innovation Solution

A variable EAS detection algorithm is implemented based on the speed of individuals passing through the zone, adjusting the detection criteria to reduce the rigor of the algorithm when high speeds are detected, allowing for quicker alarm generation and improved detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed time duration detection process is used, then detection reliability is improved for slow-moving individuals, but detection capability deteriorates for fast-moving individuals who pass through the zone too quickly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection capability for varying speeds
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a static, fixed-time detection process to a dynamic, speed-adaptive detection process. The system continuously monitors the time of flight (TOF) of individuals through the surveillance zone and adjusts the detection algorithm's required signal count accordingly. When faster movement is detected, the system reduces the required number of signals, allowing the detection criteria to adapt in real-time to varying speeds while maintaining reliable detection across different movement scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the detection algorithm rigor is increased to reduce false alarms, then false alarm rate is improved, but detection sensitivity deteriorates for fast-moving individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoiddetection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the detection algorithm's critical parameters based on measured movement speed. Specifically, the system changes the required signal count threshold dynamically. When individuals move faster than a predetermined speed threshold, the system reduces the required signal count, thereby lowering the detection barrier and maintaining sensitivity. This parameter adjustment allows the system to maintain both low false alarm rates and high detection sensitivity across varying speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a fixed detection time duration is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to missed detections during high-speed passages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddetection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by implementing a closed-loop system that continuously monitors the time of flight (TOF) of individuals through the surveillance zone and uses this information to adjust detection parameters in real-time. The system measures actual movement speed and feeds this information back to modify the required signal count threshold. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain high detection effectiveness without requiring complex pre-programmed responses for different speed scenarios, preserving relative simplicity while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The variable algorithm enhances the likelihood of detecting EAS tags and reduces false alarms by adapting to varying speeds, effectively addressing the issue of missed detections during high-speed passages and potentially preventing shoplifting.

Implementation Method 1

An exciter coil is used to generate an electromagnetic field within a surveillance zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field generation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a response is detected to the electromagnetic field caused by one or more objects within the surveillance zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic signal detection: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3347881B1Systems and methods for variable detection based on traffic counter input
Publication Date: 2020.04.22 SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORP
  • EP3347881B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3347881B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP3347881B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

In an Electronic Article Surveillance ("EAS") system a response is detected to an electromagnetic field. The response is caused by one or more objects present within the surveillance zone and an alarm condition is then selectively generated in accordance with one or more detection algorithms. A speed of a person traveling through the surveillance zone is measured, and if the speed exceeds a threshold then at least one characteristic of the detection algorithm(s) is varied to decrease a rigor of the detection algorithm.