Variable Flow Orifice for Exhaust Sampling Oversampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current exhaust sampling systems oversample during transient operating conditions of engines, leading to inaccurate assessments of particulate matter production due to pressure increases in the exhaust stack, which existing feedback arrangements fail to account for.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an orifice in the flow path of the test probe that restricts flow when pressure differentials are large, ensuring the flow opening size is adjusted based on the desired flow rate and pressure differential magnitude to maintain proportional sampling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a fixed flow area opening is used on the test probe, then the system is simple to operate, but oversampling occurs during pressure increases leading to inaccurate measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticulate matter measurement accuracyVSAvoidflow control mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by replacing the fixed flow area opening with a variable flow area opening that can dynamically adjust its size in response to changing pressure differentials. The flow area is modified from a static configuration to one that actively responds to transient operating conditions, allowing the system to maintain proportional sampling accuracy during both steady-state and transient conditions without requiring complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If feedback arrangement uses only pressure differential between exhaust gas and sampling probe, then the control system is simple, but it fails to account for variations in combined flow seen by the filter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling proportionality accuracyVSAvoidfeedback control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the feedback principle by implementing a control system that uses multiple input parameters (exhaust gas pressure differential and combined flow rate seen by the filter) to dynamically adjust the flow area opening. This multi-parameter feedback approach ensures proportional sampling accuracy by compensating for variations in both pressure and flow conditions, rather than relying solely on pressure differential feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the parameter changes principle by modifying the flow area opening based on changes in operating conditions (pressure differential and combined flow rate). The system dynamically adjusts the physical parameter of flow area to maintain consistent sampling proportionality across varying transient and steady-state conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If flow into the test probe is unrestricted, then the sampling system responds quickly to changes, but pressure increases during transients cause oversampling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling response speedVSAvoidparticulate matter production assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by implementing a flow area opening that dynamically adjusts its restriction level based on real-time pressure differential conditions. During transient pressure increases, the opening automatically restricts flow to prevent oversampling, while during steady-state conditions it remains more open to maintain quick response speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces oversampling and provides accurate particulate matter production assessments during transient events by maintaining proper sampling proportionality and mitigating pressure-induced distortions in the sampling system.

Implementation Method 1

when a pressure differential between the exhaust stack at a probe location and atmospheric pressure is small, but flow into the test probe is restricted when the pressure differential is large

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8256307B2Particulate sampling system and method of reducing oversampling during transients
Publication Date: 2012.09.04 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US8256307B2 patent drawing
  • US8256307B2 patent drawing
  • US8256307B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Testing of engine particulate matter production during a transient is made more accurate by selecting an appropriate sized opening for a test probe of the sampling system located in the exhaust line upstream from a particulate trap. By examining the pressure signature at the test probe location and utilizing that information in conjunction with a desired volumetric flow rate into the sampling system, a flow opening size for the test probe can be selected that reduces potential oversampling which may be otherwise induced due to the back pressure increases in the exhaust line caused by the presence of the particulate trap. The flow opening into the test probe of the sampling system behaves relative unrestricted when pressure differentials at the test probe location are relatively low, such as during steady state operating conditions, but restricts flow into the sampling system when pressure differentials are relatively high, such as at a pressure during a transient event.