Variable Geometry Exhaust End Chamber for Noise and Back Pressure Trade-off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exhaust systems for internal combustion engines face challenges in achieving ideal fluid-dynamic behavior and natural exhaust noise, especially in sports vehicles, while complying with sound emission regulations and maintaining performance across varying engine speeds, and are often compromised by the presence of turbocharged engines and emission treatment devices.

Innovation Solution

The exhaust system incorporates twin exhaust ducts with end chambers featuring movable partitions and an electronically controlled adjustment valve, allowing for variable geometry to optimize noise damping and back pressure, ensuring compliance with type approval rules and enhancing performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a silencer with labyrinth structure is used to damp noise at low engine speeds, then noise damping is improved, but exhaust back pressure increases exponentially at high engine speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise dampingVSAvoidexhaust back pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust system employs a variable geometry end chamber with movable partitions that can change position based on engine speed. At low speeds, partitions are positioned to maximize noise damping; at high speeds, they move to reduce back pressure, dynamically adapting the chamber geometry to operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the geometric parameters of the end chamber by moving partitions between different positions. This alters the volume, shape, and flow characteristics of the chamber to optimize performance across different engine speed ranges, transitioning from noise-damping configuration to low-backpressure configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a bypass duct with bypass valve is added to reduce exhaust back pressure at high engine speeds, then performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine performanceVSAvoidexhaust system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end chamber with movable partitions serves multiple functions: it acts as a silencer at low speeds, a flow optimizer at high speeds, and provides acoustic tuning. This multi-functionality replaces the need for separate bypass ducts and valves, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining performance benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If emission treatment devices are added to comply with emission standards, then pollution reduction is improved, but sound performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollution reductionVSAvoidsound performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The variable geometry end chamber acts as an intermediary acoustic device positioned after emission treatment devices. It compensates for the sound degradation caused by catalytic converters and particulate filters by providing active noise damping and acoustic tuning, restoring natural exhaust sound characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Stress or pressure

If the outlet opening width is varied to optimize fluid-dynamic behavior, then back pressure is minimized, but noise damping capability changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback pressureVSAvoidnoise damping
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple movable partitions are positioned independently to create different geometric configurations. The system dynamically adjusts the outlet opening width and chamber volume based on engine speed and load, optimizing the balance between back pressure reduction and noise damping at each operating point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11988124B2Exhaust system for an internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 FERRARI SPA
  • US11988124B2 patent drawing
  • US11988124B2 patent drawing
  • US11988124B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exhaust system for an internal combustion engine and having an end chamber having a first inlet opening and a second inlet opening, which are separate from and independent of one another, and an outlet opening, through which exhaust gases are released into the atmosphere; an exhaust duct, which originates from the internal combustion engine and leads to the first inlet opening of the end chamber; a silencer device, which has an outlet opening, which directly leads to the second inlet opening of the end chamber; a bypass duct, which originates from the exhaust duct in the area of a bifurcation and ends in an inlet opening of the silencer device; and an adjustment valve, which can be electronically controlled, is arranged along the exhaust duct downstream of the bifurcation where the bypass duct originates and is designed to adjust the exhaust gas flow towards the first inlet opening of the end chamber.