Variable Inlet Geometry Mechanism Control for Aircraft Engines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for gas turbine engines with variable geometry mechanisms provide a common schedule for all engines, limiting operability and performance, especially in varying wind conditions and aircraft positions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that receive input signals for engine operating parameters and crosswind levels to determine a customized schedule for positioning the variable inlet geometry mechanism, allowing for optimized engine performance and improved crosswind tolerance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a common VGM schedule is provided for all engines, then the control system is simple, but engine operability and performance are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine operabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system by creating separate VGM schedules for different engines based on their specific operating conditions, engine positions, and performance characteristics. Each engine receives a customized schedule rather than a common one, allowing tailored optimization for each engine's unique operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of VGM schedules based on real-time operating parameters, engine position, and performance data. The control system continuously adapts the schedules to changing conditions, making the control approach flexible and responsive rather than static and rigid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If engine-specific VGM schedules are implemented, then engine performance is optimized, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor engine operating parameters, performance metrics, and environmental conditions. This feedback is used to continuously refine and adjust engine-specific VGM schedules, ensuring optimal efficiency while managing control complexity through data-driven decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes engine efficiency by dynamically changing VGM parameters based on operating conditions, engine position, and performance data. The system adjusts geometry mechanism positioning parameters to maximize productivity and efficiency for each specific engine configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If VGM control is adjusted for crosswind conditions, then crosswind tolerance is improved, but measurement and control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrosswind-induced distortionVSAvoidcrosswind measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses intermediary parameters such as airspeed measurements and engine operating data as proxies for direct crosswind measurement. By monitoring these intermediate variables and their relationship to crosswind conditions, the system indirectly detects and responds to crosswind-induced distortion without requiring direct crosswind sensing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10605166B2System and method for variable geometry mechanism control
Publication Date: 2020.03.31 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US10605166B2 patent drawing
  • US10605166B2 patent drawing
  • US10605166B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for controlling a variable inlet geometry mechanism of an aircraft engine. At least one first input signal indicative of at least one operating parameter of an aircraft engine is received. At least one second input signal indicative of a level of crosswind experienced by the aircraft and of an airspeed of the aircraft being below a predetermined threshold is received. A schedule is determined for positioning a the variable inlet geometry mechanism based on the at least one first input signal and of the at least one second input signal. The variable inlet geometry mechanism is then positioned in accordance with the schedule.