Variable Lordosis Spacer for Low-Distraction Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fusion devices require significant distraction and often necessitate removal of bone to fit properly, failing to account for lordosis and maintaining intervertebral spacing, leading to installation difficulties and prolonged healing times.

Innovation Solution

An expandable fusion device with endplates and ramps that can transition between collapsed and expanded configurations, allowing insertion at minimal distraction height and maintaining normal disc spacing while accommodating lordosis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fusion devices are used, then intervertebral fusion can be achieved, but significant distraction is required and bone removal is needed to fit properly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion successVSAvoidinstallation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The fusion device incorporates an expandable cage structure that transitions from a compressed insertion state to an expanded functional state. The cage expands along its longitudinal axis after insertion, allowing the device to be inserted at minimal distraction height and then expand to maintain normal disc spacing, eliminating the need for significant pre-distraction or bone removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The expandable cage is designed to be inserted in a collapsed or compressed configuration and then expanded to its full functional size within the intervertebral space. This nesting principle allows the device to pass through a smaller insertion pathway and then occupy the appropriate functional volume, avoiding the need for large impaction forces or bone removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If traditional fusion devices are used, then vertebral bodies can be fused, but lordosis curvature is not adequately accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion stabilityVSAvoidlordosis accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fusion device incorporates asymmetric wedge-shaped elements or variable thickness in its structure to accommodate and correct lordosis curvature. The device can be configured with different angles or geometries on its anterior and posterior aspects, allowing it to match the natural lumbar lordosis and provide proper alignment between adjacent vertebral bodies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The device features localized structural variations including asymmetric endplate configurations and variable wall thicknesses that are specifically designed to accommodate lordotic curvature. These local quality modifications allow the device to conform to the natural spine curvature while maintaining overall fusion stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If conventional fusion devices are used, then fusion can be achieved, but procedure time is prolonged due to bone removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefusion outcomeVSAvoidhealing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable cage eliminates the need for bone removal by expanding within the existing intervertebral space after minimal distraction. This dynamic expansion approach preserves more native bone structure and reduces surgical preparation time compared to traditional devices that require bone removal for proper fitting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device is pre-configured with expandable structures and lordosis compensation features that are activated after insertion. This preliminary preparation allows the device to adapt to the specific anatomical requirements without requiring time-consuming bone removal or intraoperative customization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Length of stationary object

If fusion devices are dimensioned larger to maintain height, then disc spacing can be maintained, but installation becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisc spacingVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The fusion device transitions from a compressed insertion configuration to an expanded functional configuration. In the compressed state, the device has reduced height allowing easy insertion into the distracted intervertebral space. After insertion, the device expands to achieve the appropriate disc spacing and maintain proper vertebral alignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cage structure is designed to be inserted in a nested or collapsed state and then expanded to its full functional dimensions. This allows the device to pass through a smaller insertion pathway and then occupy the appropriate functional volume to maintain normal disc spacing without requiring large impaction forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS12390341B2Variable lordosis spacer and related methods of use
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 GLOBUS MEDICAL INC
  • US12390341B2 patent drawing
  • US12390341B2 patent drawing
  • US12390341B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An expandable fusion device may include a first endplate and a second endplate. The expandable fusion device may also include first and second ramps configured to mate with both the first and second endplates. An inserter instrument includes an outer shaft having a bore extending longitudinally therethrough and an inner shaft extending through the bore in the outer shaft. The outer shaft is configured to engage the first or second opening in the second ramp, and the inner shaft is configured to engage the corresponding first or second opening in the first ramp to control implant height and/or lordotic angle.