Variable Payout Futures Contracts for Risk Hedging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current risk management systems lack the ability to effectively hedge a wide range of everyday risks faced by individuals and organizations, such as prolonged work stoppages, macroeconomic surprises, and government decisions, due to inadequate contract diversity, high transaction costs, liquidity restrictions, and limitations in real-time communication and market accessibility.

Innovation Solution

A computer-network based futures trading system that enables low-overhead, real-time trading of risk management contracts across a virtually unlimited range of events, accessible globally, with features like contract bundling, splitting, and recombination, and the creation of new hedging instruments, facilitating simultaneous trading of both public and restricted instruments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional risk management systems are used, then risk coverage is limited to common risks, but they cannot hedge against unique or difficult-to-place risks such as prolonged work stoppages, macroeconomic surprises, and government decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk coverage scopeVSAvoidcontract diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the traditional monolithic risk management approach into multiple specialized futures markets, each dedicated to specific risk types (e.g., work stoppage risk, macroeconomic risk, government decision risk). This segmentation allows for tailored contract designs that address unique risks while maintaining liquidity through aggregation of similar contracts across multiple markets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal risk management platform that handles multiple types of risks through a common infrastructure. The system provides multi-functionality by enabling trading of various futures contracts (binary, traditional, exotic) across different risk categories within a single integrated system, allowing participants to manage diverse risks through one access point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If insurance companies use capital leveraging system, then they can accept various risks subject to underwriting guidelines, but their capital is insufficient to pay if all policies claim their limits simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk acceptance flexibilityVSAvoidclaims paying ability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the aggregate risk portfolio into separate, specialized futures markets for different risk types. This segmentation isolates risks so that claims in one market do not directly impact the solvency of other markets, while the Market Authority maintains separate capital reserves for each market based on specific risk characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the capital structure parameter from a unified leveraged system to a distributed capital model where the Market Authority holds sufficient capital specifically allocated to each futures market. This parameter change ensures that the Market Authority can meet obligations in any single market without being constrained by the aggregate portfolio's leverage ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If futures markets require minimum trading volume, then they can ensure liquidity, but they cannot sanction and administer trading of securities with low trading volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarket liquidityVSAvoidmarket accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple low-volume futures markets into a single integrated system under the Market Authority. By combining the infrastructure and capital reserves across markets, the system achieves sufficient aggregate liquidity to support individual markets with low trading volumes, while maintaining separate risk isolation through specialized market structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If brick and mortar futures markets are used, then trading can be regulated and supervised, but real-time communication and global market accessibility are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidglobal accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces the Market Authority as an intermediary that bridges traditional regulatory oversight with modern electronic trading. The Market Authority acts as a supervised entity that can facilitate global electronic access while maintaining regulatory compliance through its structured role in contract issuance, trading oversight, and settlement management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical brick-and-mortar trading floor system with an electronic digital platform. This substitution enables real-time global communication and access while maintaining regulatory oversight through the Market Authority's electronic monitoring and control mechanisms, eliminating the need for physical presence while preserving supervisory capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10803520B2Risk management contracts and method and apparatus for trading same
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 NORTH AMERICAN DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE
  • US10803520B2 patent drawing
  • US10803520B2 patent drawing
  • US10803520B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are various exemplary methods and apparatus for implementation of futures securities custom tailored to specific clienteles; one or more variable pay-out futures contracts as devices for hedging; hedging contracts having variable pay-outs; variable payout hedging contracts having limited exposure; freezing assets of an originator of an order to buy or sell a variable pay-out contract sufficient to cover a maximum exposure of the contract; determining whether an originator of an order to buy or sell a variable pay-out contract has assets sufficient to cover the contract at the time of placing the order; determining whether an originator of an order to buy or sell a variable pay-out contract has assets sufficient to cover the contract immediately before fulfilling the order and charging a penalty to an originator of an order to buy or sell a variable pay-out contract who does not have assets sufficient to cover the contract.