Variable Pitch Lock Encoding Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locks with equally spaced blocking elements are limited in encoding variations and increase in complexity and cost when additional blocking elements are added, necessitating a more efficient configuration.

Innovation Solution

A lock design featuring at least two different pitch values, where the second pitch value is a multiple of the first, allowing for varied distribution of step values among locking elements to enhance encoding capabilities without increasing complexity or cost, and a manufacturing process associating specific lock distributions with product categories.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additional blocking elements are added to increase encoding variations, then the number of different encryption methods increases, but the lock complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding variationsVSAvoidlock complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pitch parameter (spacing distance) between locking elements from a uniform value to multiple different values. By varying the pitch between adjacent locking elements, the system achieves increased encoding variations without adding more blocking elements, thus resolving the contradiction between versatility and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of variation by using different pitch values between locking elements along the rotational axis. Instead of increasing the number of elements radially, the invention exploits the axial spacing dimension to create additional encoding possibilities, thereby increasing versatility without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional blocking elements are added to increase encoding variations, then the number of different encryption methods increases, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding variationsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By modifying the pitch parameter between locking elements instead of adding more elements, the patent reduces manufacturing cost. The varying pitch can be achieved through standard manufacturing processes without requiring additional blocking elements, thereby improving versatility while maintaining ease of manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a limited number of different pitch values (not every possible spacing variation) to achieve sufficient encoding variations. This partial approach provides adequate versatility while avoiding the excessive complexity and cost that would result from using all possible pitch combinations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2792824B1Lock, sets of locks and fabrication process of products
Publication Date: 2019.10.16 VALEO SECURITE HABITACLE
  • EP2792824B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2792824B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The lock (100) comprises: - a stator (102); - a rotor (106) mounted for rotation relative to the stator (102) about an axis, called axis Δ, and having a key insertion channel (108) into which axis Δ extends; and - locking elements (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H) for the rotor (106) arranged successively along axis Δ and each separated from the next by a distance, called a "pitch," the locking elements being designed to detect the insertion of a compatible key into the channel (108) to allow rotation of the rotor (106) relative to the stator (102). At least two pitches have different values ​​(P1, P2).