Variable-Pitch Milling Cutter for Chatter Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Milling tools experience chatter vibrations, especially at high cutting speeds and large cutting depths, leading to reduced surface quality and tool wear, and existing methods to prevent chatter are time-consuming and costly.

Innovation Solution

A milling tool design with a first division region where all pitch angles differ and have no repetitive sequence, providing aperiodic vibration excitation that dampens chatter independently of the system's natural frequencies, combined with a second division region for maximum static rigidity and a specific helix angle distribution for continuous cutting edges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the number of cutting edges is increased to improve damping of chatter vibrations, then chatter vibrations are reduced, but passive force increases leading to greater tool deflection and form errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping of chatter vibrationsVSAvoidform errors on machined workpiece
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by implementing unequal pitch angles between adjacent cutting edges. Specifically, the pitch angle between two directly adjacent cutting edges differs from the pitch angle between other adjacent cutting edges. This asymmetric distribution creates aperiodic excitation frequencies that effectively dampen chatter vibrations without requiring an increased number of cutting edges, thereby avoiding the increased passive forces and tool deflection that would otherwise occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If the helix angle of cutting edges is increased to improve smooth running and reduce chatter, then chatter vibrations are reduced, but passive force and tool deflection increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmooth running and damping of chatterVSAvoidtool deflection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements asymmetry in the helix angle distribution across different cutting edges. At least one cutting edge has a first helix angle while another cutting edge has a second helix angle that differs from the first. This asymmetric helix angle configuration allows each cutting edge to engage the workpiece at different angles, creating aperiodic excitation that dampens chatter vibrations without requiring uniformly high helix angles that would increase passive forces and tool deflection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Reliability

If the helix angle is increased to increase cutting edge length in engagement, then chatter vibrations are reduced, but axial component of cutting force increases pulling the tool out of clamp

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping of chatter vibrationsVSAvoidaxial component of cutting force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by varying the helix angle across different cutting edges rather than using a uniform high helix angle. This asymmetric distribution allows the cutting edges to engage the workpiece with different axial force components, creating aperiodic excitation that dampens chatter while the overall axial force remains controlled. The varied helix angles prevent the cumulative axial pull-out force that would result from all edges having high helix angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Strength

If conventional clamping is used to secure the milling tool against pulling out, then tool security is improved, but concentricity of the chuck is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against pulling outVSAvoidconcentricity of the chuck
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements asymmetry in cutting edge geometry (unequal pitch angles and varied helix angles) to reduce the axial component of cutting forces. This reduction in axial pull-out force means that conventional clamping can maintain both adequate tool security and high chuck concentricity, as the asymmetric geometry prevents the generation of excessive axial forces that would compromise concentricity when countered by strong clamping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The milling tool achieves high dynamic and static rigidity, effectively damping chatter vibrations, resulting in high-quality surfaces and extended tool life, particularly suitable for trochoidal milling at high speeds and deep cuts.

Implementation Method 1

providing aperiodic vibration excitation that dampens chatter independently of the system's natural frequencies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP2983852B1Milling tool
Publication Date: 2021.09.22 MAPAL DR KRESS SE & CO KG
  • EP2983852B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2983852B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2983852B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a milling tool (1) comprising a base body (3) having center axis (M) which comprises a clamping region (5) and a working region (7), wherein the working region (7) has a face (9) and a circumferential surface (11) connected to the face (9), viewed in the axial direction, wherein at least four geometrically defined cutting edges (13, 15, 17, 19, 21) are arranged on the circumferential surface (11), wherein two directly adjacent cutting edges (13, 15, 17, 19, 21) are spaced apart from each other by an angular pitch (α, ß, γ, δ, ε), viewed in the circumferential direction. The milling tool (1) is characterized in that the working region (7), viewed along the center axis, has a first pitch region (23) in which all pitch angles (α, ß, γ, δ, ε) are different from each other.