Variable Power Control Parameters for Wireless Signal Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for forward and reverse link power control in wireless telecommunications networks are slow to respond to rapid changes in RF conditions, such as 'fast fades,' which can lead to poor signal quality and call drops.

Innovation Solution

Implementing variable power control parameters that adjust based on signal quality metrics like signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and frame error rate (FER), allowing for larger adjustments during low signal quality to quickly compensate and reduce power when conditions improve.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional fixed power control parameters are used, then the system is simple to operate, but the response speed to rapid RF condition changes is slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to RF condition changesVSAvoidpower control parameter adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic power control parameters that automatically adjust based on observed error levels. The system transitions from fixed parameters to variable parameters that adapt in real-time to RF conditions, enabling faster response to fast fades while maintaining operational simplicity through automated adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes power control parameters (target SNR, power adjustment increments) based on observed error levels. When error levels indicate poor signal quality, the system adjusts parameters to enable larger power increases; when conditions improve, parameters are adjusted to enable faster power reductions, optimizing response speed across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If larger power adjustments are made during low signal quality, then the response to fast fades is faster, but the power usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to signal quality changesVSAvoidtransmit power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts power control parameters based on observed error levels. During low signal quality, larger power adjustment increments are applied to quickly compensate for fast fades. When signal quality improves, the system reduces power using adjusted parameters that enable faster descent, thereby optimizing overall power consumption while maintaining fast response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors error levels and uses this feedback to adjust both the target SNR and power adjustment increments. This closed-loop control ensures that large power adjustments are applied only when necessary (during fast fades), while normal operating conditions use more conservative adjustments, optimizing the balance between response speed and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the setpoint is adjusted frequently to maintain signal quality, then the signal quality is maintained better, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal quality maintenanceVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts the target SNR parameter based on observed error levels to maintain signal quality. By dynamically changing the target SNR rather than making frequent setpoint adjustments, the system maintains better signal quality during fast fades while avoiding the complexity of continuous control parameter reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively adjusts the target SNR based on observed error trends before signal quality deteriorates completely. This preliminary action prevents the need for more complex reactive control mechanisms, maintaining signal quality through anticipatory parameter adjustment rather than frequent corrective setpoint changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8213979B1Method and system for forward link and/or reverse link power control
Publication Date: 2012.07.03 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US8213979B1 patent drawing
  • US8213979B1 patent drawing
  • US8213979B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for adjusting a transmit power of a forward link or reverse link signal make use of variable adjustment parameters. The wireless signal is received to obtain a received signal. An observed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and an observed frame error rate (FER) for the received signal are determined. In an outer loop process, an adjustment increment is selected based on how much the observed FER differs from the target FER, and the target SNR is adjusted by the adjustment increment. In an inner loop process, a power adjustment command is selected based on a comparison between the observed SNR and a target SNR. The power adjustment command instructs the transmitter of the wireless signal to either increase or decrease the transmit power of the wireless signal. The power adjustment increment may also depend on the observed FER.