Variable Displacement Pump Control for High Turn-Down Fuel Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Variable displacement pumps (VDPs) face inefficiencies due to high turn-down ratios, particularly in fuel delivery systems for gas turbine engines, where minimum pump pressure flows are higher than the lowest flow requirements, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A system incorporating a variable displacement pump with an electromechanical actuator, bypass valve, minimum pressure shutoff valve, and flow sensing valve, controlled by a controller to manage flow and pressure, allowing recirculation and direct electrical actuation to maintain efficient operation across varying flow conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a variable displacement pump is designed with high turn-down ratio capability, then the pump can function across a wider flow range, but pump efficiency deteriorates throughout the operating range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturn-down ratioVSAvoidpump efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The pump system is segmented into multiple functional zones using bypass valves and flow control mechanisms. The pump operation is divided into high-flow mode (where bypass valve is closed) and low-flow mode (where bypass valve is open), allowing each segment to operate at optimal efficiency points while covering a wide turn-down ratio range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A bypass valve acts as an intermediary element that diverts excess flow away from the pump outlet when operating at high displacement settings. This mediator allows the pump to maintain high efficiency by operating at a fixed optimal point while the bypass valve handles the variable flow requirements, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Temperature

If minimum pump pressure flow is increased to support VDP cooling, then cooling capability is improved, but the lowest flow for fuel burners cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVDP coolingVSAvoidfuel flow to burners
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The bypass valve is dynamically controlled based on real-time flow demands. During high-demand periods, the bypass valve closes to maximize fuel flow to burners. During low-demand periods, the bypass valve opens to provide sufficient flow for VDP cooling, creating a dynamic system that adapts to changing operational requirements and resolves the contradiction between cooling needs and fuel delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If conventional valve systems are used for flow control, then flow management is achieved, but system weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow controlVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple valve functions are merged into integrated valve assemblies. The bypass valve incorporates both flow control and cooling functions, while the BOPV combines bypass and shutoff capabilities in a single integrated component. This merging reduces the total number of separate valves and associated hardware, thereby reducing system weight while maintaining comprehensive flow control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances pump efficiency by reducing valve count, minimizing horsepower extraction, and decreasing system weight and heat rejection, enabling better fuel management and performance in aircraft engines.

Implementation Method 1

An electromechanical actuator (EMA) is operatively connected to actuate the variable displacement mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromechanical conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

A bypass valve (BPV) can includes BPV inlet in fluid communication with the outlet line, and a BPV outlet in fluid communication with a bypass line that feeds into the inlet line upstream of the VDP

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid recirculation:

Implementation Method 3

The MPSOV can be connected in fluid communication with the outlet line, configured to block flow through the outlet line for shutoff

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control:

Implementation Method 4

A flow sensing valve (FSV) can be connected in the outlet line, wherein the FSV includes a sensor configured to generate sensor data indicative of flow out of the outlet line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow sensing:

Implementation Method 5

A first electrohydraulic servo valve (EHSV) can be connected in fluid communication with the BPV by a first control line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrohydraulic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20240350722A1Electrically direct controlled variable displacement pumps
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US20240350722A1 patent drawing
  • US20240350722A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a variable displacement pump (VDP) in fluid communication with an inlet line and with an outlet line. The VDP includes a variable displacement mechanism configured to vary pressure to the outlet line. An electromechanical actuator (EMA) is operatively connected to actuate the variable displacement mechanism for direct electromechanical control of the VDP.