Variable-sized seat back for a vehicle seat

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional occupant supports in vehicles fail to accommodate occupants of varying sizes effectively, leading to inadequate support and comfort, particularly in the upper back region.

Innovation Solution

An occupant support system with an adjustable upper-back support system that includes inflatable bladders and an actuator, allowing the seat back to change its outer contour by inflating or deflating the bladders, and moving the adjustable back support relative to the frame to accommodate different-sized occupants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed seat back design is used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but it cannot accommodate occupants of varying sizes effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of different sized occupantsVSAvoidseat back structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seat back is transformed from a fixed structure to a dynamic, adjustable structure. The upper-back support system can move between multiple positions and the inflatable bladder allows continuous adjustment of the outer contour, enabling the seat back to adapt to different occupant sizes and preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The seat back is divided into distinct functional zones: a fixed lower portion and an adjustable upper-back support system. This segmentation allows the lower part to remain simple while the upper part provides adaptability for different occupants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If an adjustable upper-back support system is added, then comfort and support for different occupants is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability for comfortVSAvoidupper-back support system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An inflatable bladder is integrated into the upper-back support system to dynamically adjust the outer contour of the seat back. This pneumatic mechanism provides smooth, continuous adjustment of support firmness and shape without requiring complex mechanical linkages or multiple discrete components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The upper-back support system performs multiple functions: it adjusts to different occupant sizes, provides variable firmness through inflation/deflation, and can be positioned at multiple angles. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate adjustment mechanisms into a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the outer contour of the seat back is made variable, then support for different body types is enhanced, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariable outer contour adaptationVSAvoidseat back manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The outer contour of the seat back is adjusted by changing the inflation parameter of the integrated bladder rather than by physically reconfiguring the seat back structure. This allows the same basic structure to produce multiple contour variations through simple parameter adjustment (inflation pressure), greatly simplifying manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The inflatable bladder is nested within the upper-back support system, allowing the contour adjustment mechanism to be contained within the existing seat back structure. This nesting approach avoids adding external components and keeps the manufacturing process relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides improved support and comfort for occupants by dynamically adjusting the seat back contour to fit various sizes, enhancing the overall seating experience by ensuring proper upper back and shoulder support.

Implementation Method 1

an inflatable bladder configured to inflate and deflate selectively to vary an outer contour of the seat back

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInflation/Deflation: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

The actuator is configured to move between a retracted state and a fully-extended state to cause the adjustable back support to translate relative to the frame and rotate about a rotation axis relative to the frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical actuation: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10358054B2Variable-sized seat back for a vehicle seat
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 FAURECIA AUTOMOTIVE SEATING LLC
  • US10358054B2 patent drawing
  • US10358054B2 patent drawing
  • US10358054B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An occupant support adapted for use in a vehicle includes a seat bottom coupled to a floor of the vehicle and a seat back configured to pivot about a seat-back pivot axis relative to the seat bottom between an upright position and a folded-forward position. The occupant support further includes an upper-back support system configured to support an upper back of an occupant of the occupant support.