Variable Slice Thickness for 3D Printing Step Effect

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D printing technologies face a trade-off between printing efficiency and accuracy due to fixed layer thickness, leading to a 'step effect' on non-vertical surfaces, which compromises surface quality and increases costs.

Innovation Solution

A layer-thickness variable slicing method that adjusts slice thickness based on slope angles, using the formula δ = k * sinα min, where k ranges from 0.1 to 1, to optimize slice thickness for different surface orientations, ensuring efficient and accurate printing by varying slice thicknesses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fixed layer thickness is used for slicing, then printing efficiency is improved, but surface quality deteriorates due to step effect on non-vertical surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting efficiencyVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic layer thickness adjustment by varying the slice thickness according to the slope angle of each layer's outer profile. The slicing system calculates the minimum slope angle α_min for each layer and adjusts the layer thickness δ dynamically using the formula δ = k × sin(α_min), where k is a control parameter. This transforms the static fixed-thickness slicing into a dynamic adaptive process that responds to geometric features, resolving the contradiction between efficiency and surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the slicing parameter (layer thickness) based on the geometric parameters (slope angles) of the workpiece. By establishing a functional relationship between layer thickness and slope angle through the formula δ = k × sin(α_min), the system adaptively adjusts thickness parameters to match surface geometry, thereby eliminating step effects on inclined surfaces while maintaining reasonable printing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If layer thickness is increased to improve efficiency, then printing speed is improved, but accuracy deteriorates due to severe step effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidprinting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different layer thicknesses to different spatial locations based on their slope characteristics. Vertical surfaces (α_min = 90°) receive thicker slices for efficiency, while inclined surfaces (smaller α_min) receive thinner slices proportional to sin(α_min) to maintain accuracy. This localized adaptation resolves the contradiction by optimizing thickness for each specific geometric context rather than using a uniform global parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If layer thickness is decreased to improve accuracy, then surface quality is improved, but printing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidprinting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the slicing parameter (layer thickness) based on the geometric parameters (slope angles) of the workpiece. By establishing a functional relationship between layer thickness and slope angle through the formula δ = k × sin(α_min), the system adaptively adjusts thickness parameters to match surface geometry, thereby eliminating step effects on inclined surfaces while maintaining reasonable printing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3812134B1Layer-thickness variable slicing method, 3D printing method and 3D printed product
Publication Date: 2022.06.29 KOCEL INTELLIGENT MACHINERY LIMITED
  • EP3812134B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3812134B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3812134B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Provided are a layer-thickness variable slicing method, a 3D printing method and a 3D printed product in the technical field of additive manufacturing. The layer-thickness variable slicing method comprises the following steps: analyzing and identifying the slope angle α of each slicing position on inner and outer profiles of a three-dimensional model with respect to a slicing direction, and determining the minimum value αmin of the slope angles α at the same slicing position; setting a function relationship between the minimum value αmin of the slope angles α corresponding to each portion of the inner and outer profiles and the thickness δ of a slice layer, wherein the minimum value αmin of the slope angles and the thickness δ of the slice layer form a linear function relationship therebetween; and determining the thicknesses of the slice layers corresponding to the portions of the entire product three-dimensional model. By means of the method of the present application, slices of different layer thicknesses are printed according to different profiles of a product, such that a step effect generated by equal layer-thickness slicing can be eliminated, thereby improving the quality of the product while taking into account the efficiency of printing.