Variable Speed Compressor Lost Rotor Detection and Override Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current HVAC systems face challenges in efficiently controlling compressor speed, particularly during defrost cycles and under varying operating conditions, which can lead to increased noise, energy inefficiency, and potential compressor damage.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a drive controller with a speed control module, defrost module, and operational envelope determination module that dynamically adjusts compressor speed, enables a defrost mode to reduce noise and maintain efficiency by ramping speeds during defrost cycles and adhering to operational envelopes based on refrigerant pressures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If compressor speed is increased to improve cooling efficiency, then productivity increases, but audible noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidaudible noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts compressor speed based on operating conditions. During defrost cycles, the controller reduces compressor speed to minimize noise, while during normal cooling operation, it maintains higher speeds for optimal cooling efficiency. This dynamic speed adjustment resolves the contradiction by adapting the compressor operation to different system states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes the speed parameter of the compressor based on detected operating conditions. When a defrost cycle is initiated, the controller modifies the speed parameter from high (for cooling) to low (for defrost), thereby changing the operational parameters to balance productivity and noise generation across different system requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If compressor speed is rapidly adjusted to respond to changing conditions, then adaptability improves, but mechanical stress increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to operating conditionsVSAvoidmechanical stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements periodic speed adjustments rather than continuous rapid changes. During defrost cycles, the compressor speed is reduced in a controlled manner, allowing the mechanical components to adapt gradually. This periodic adjustment approach maintains adaptability to changing conditions while reducing mechanical stress compared to abrupt speed changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares for speed changes by implementing controlled ramping profiles. Before transitioning to a defrost cycle, the controller gradually reduces compressor speed over a predetermined period, cushioning the mechanical transition and preventing sudden stress on motor and compressor components while still achieving the necessary adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If defrost cycle is implemented to remove ice buildup, then reliability improves, but compressor noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation continuityVSAvoidcompressor noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts compressor speed specifically during defrost cycles. By reducing speed during these periods, the system maintains reliability through proper defrost operation while minimizing the noise that would otherwise occur during high-speed operation. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between ensuring reliable defrost cycles and maintaining acceptable noise levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If compressor operates at high speed continuously to meet cooling demand, then productivity increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling outputVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic operation patterns, alternating between high-speed cooling mode and low-speed defrost mode. During defrost cycles, the compressor operates at reduced speed or idle, consuming minimal energy while still maintaining system reliability. This periodic alternation between high and low speed operation achieves the necessary cooling output over time while significantly reducing overall energy consumption compared to continuous high-speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3186513B1Variable speed compressor control with lost rotor mitigation
Publication Date: 2021.03.31 EMERSON CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP3186513B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3186513B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3186513B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A drive controller for a motor of a compressor includes a drive circuit that applies voltages to windings of the motor. A speed control module controls the drive circuit to rotate the motor at a requested speed. A speed determination module generates the requested speed based on a speed demand from a system controller. A lost rotor control module identifies a lost rotor condition and, in response to identifying the lost rotor condition, instructs the speed determination module to set the requested speed to an override speed that is lower than the speed demand. The lost rotor control module identifies the lost rotor condition in response to a comparison of a speed error with an adaptive threshold. The speed error is based on a difference between requested and estimated speeds of the motor. During first and second system states, the adaptive threshold is set to first and second thresholds, respectively.