Variable Speed Conveyors for Thermoforming Productivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing thermoforming installations face constraints in manufacturing rates due to uniform processing and movement speeds across all stations, which can lead to inefficiencies and potential product damage during filling and handling.

Innovation Solution

The installation employs a control unit to manage a series of elementary conveyors, allowing for variable movement speeds and dwell times based on specific processing phases, optimizing heating and handling by keeping sheets longer in heating stations and moving them more cautiously post-thermoforming, especially when filling liquid or pasty products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If uniform processing and movement speeds are used across all stations, then the system is simple to operate, but production rates are limited by the slowest processing station

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoidconveying system control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The conveying system transitions from uniform static speed to dynamic variable speed control, where each elementary conveyor can independently adjust its speed according to the specific processing requirements of different stations, allowing optimization of dwell times without being constrained by the slowest station

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The conveying system is divided into multiple independent elementary conveyors, each capable of autonomous speed control. This segmentation allows different sections of the conveying line to operate at different speeds optimized for their specific processing tasks, rather than being constrained by a single uniform speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the substrate remains at the longest processing station for the entire duration, then that station can complete its processing, but other stations experience unnecessary downtime reducing overall productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall production efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic speed adjustment where conveyors accelerate through stations with shorter processing times and decelerate at stations requiring longer dwell times, ensuring each station receives substrate at the optimal speed for its specific processing requirements while maintaining consistent quality across all stations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If filled containers are moved quickly, then production speed increases, but product agitation causes splashing and potential contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling and conveying speedVSAvoidproduct handling safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The conveying system implements dynamic speed modulation that automatically reduces speed in the filling station and during post-filling handling to minimize product agitation and splashing, while maintaining higher speeds in other sections of the line where speed is appropriate, thus balancing productivity with product handling safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Use of energy by moving object

If the substrate is moved quickly through heating stations, then energy consumption decreases, but heating quality may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating energy consumptionVSAvoidheating quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes energy efficiency by implementing dynamic speed control that maintains higher conveyor speeds through heating stations where appropriate, reducing unnecessary dwell time and energy consumption, while ensuring minimum dwell times are met to maintain heating quality, thus achieving optimal balance between energy efficiency and processing quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances manufacturing efficiency by optimizing energy use, reducing the number of heating stations, and minimizing product agitation, thereby improving overall production rates and product handling precision.

Implementation Method 1

one station for heating the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

one station for thermoforming containers in the heated substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermoforming: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP3630615B1Facility for producing containers by means of thermoforming
Publication Date: 2023.06.21 ERCA SA
  • EP3630615B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3630615B1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP3630615B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The facility comprises a plurality of processing stations (14A, 14B, 14C, 16, 18, 20, 20, 22, 24) for producing containers from a thermoplastic substrate. The facility comprises a plurality of basic conveyors (30) that cooperate with a travel track (32), for the purpose of conveying the sheets to the processing stations, the respective movements of the basic conveyors being controlled according to respective movement control commands generated by a control unit (ECU).