Variable Speed Press Control for Robot Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional synchronization methods for mechanical presses in manufacturing processes are inefficient due to their reliance on flywheel-driven systems, leading to slower acceleration and deceleration, which increases production cycle times and reduces productivity when synchronized with robots.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method to control the speed of mechanical presses by decelerating before the unloading stage and accelerating during the loading stage, allowing for adaptive synchronization with robots based on estimated time points, enabling optimal cycle times and energy management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional flywheel-driven synchronization methods are used, then the press can maintain stable operation, but the acceleration and deceleration speeds are slow, increasing production cycle times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration and deceleration speed of the pressVSAvoidproduction cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the press speed variable rather than constant. The control system dynamically adjusts the press speed during the cycle, accelerating faster during loading stages and decelerating smoothly before unloading stages, allowing the press to adapt its speed profile to match robot operations and minimize idle time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the speed parameter of the press from a fixed value to a variable parameter that can be adjusted in real-time. By modifying the speed profile based on the synchronization state with the robot and the current stage of the press cycle, the system achieves faster acceleration and deceleration while maintaining stable operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the press speed is increased to reduce cycle time, then productivity improves, but the synchronization with loader/unloader robots becomes difficult, risking collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepress line productivityVSAvoidsynchronization reliability with robots
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the actual press speed and position, comparing them with the desired speed profile, and adjusting the motor control signals accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures that the press maintains accurate synchronization with the robot while operating at higher speeds, preventing collisions and ensuring reliable operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting future synchronization points and pre-adjusting the press speed profile accordingly. The control system calculates anticipated synchronization requirements based on robot cycle times and pre-modifies the press acceleration and deceleration phases to ensure timely alignment, rather than reacting to synchronization errors after they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2024796B1Improved method and system for operating a cyclic production machine in coordination with a loader or unloader machine
Publication Date: 2015.09.16 ABB RES LTD
  • EP2024796B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2024796B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2024796B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for synchronising a first machine of a manufacturing process section arranged to carry out a production cycle comprising a working part and a non-working part, which said first machine is operated in conjunction with at least one second machine. The first machine carries out a process during the working part of the cycle on a workpiece which is loaded into and/or unloaded out of said first machine by said at least one second machine during the non-working part of each process cycle. The first machine is preferably a mechanical press and the second machine is preferably an industrial robot arranged to carry out a loader and/or unloader function. A system for carrying out the method and a computer program are also described.