Variable Speed Aspirating Smoke Detector Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aspirated smoke detectors face challenges in balancing fan speed to minimize transport time of smoke to the central detector, which affects detection speed and power consumption, requiring a solution that optimizes both performance and longevity.

Innovation Solution

The system operates the blower at multiple speeds, increasing speed upon detection of particulate matter to quickly determine smoke presence and reducing speed for detailed analysis, allowing for faster classification of particles and extended sensor analysis time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the blower is operated at high speed, then the transport time of smoke to the central detector is reduced, but the blower life span decreases and power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport timeVSAvoidblower life span
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The blower speed is made variable rather than fixed, allowing the system to dynamically adjust between high speed (for reduced transport time) and low speed (for extended life span) based on operational requirements. The control circuit varies the blower speed according to detected particulate levels and system state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The operational parameters of the blower (speed) are changed based on system needs. The control circuit adjusts the speed parameter to optimize the balance between transport time and blower longevity, using high speed when rapid detection is needed and low speed during normal operation or analysis phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If the blower is operated at high speed, then the transport time of smoke to the central detector is reduced, but the power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport timeVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The blower operates dynamically at varying speeds rather than continuously at high speed. The control circuit adjusts the blower speed based on detected particulate levels, operating at high speed only when rapid smoke transport is needed for detection or classification, and at low speed during normal operation to reduce power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The speed parameter of the blower is adjusted based on system requirements. High speed is used temporarily when smoke detection or particle classification is needed, while low speed is maintained during normal operation to minimize energy consumption and extend battery capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If the blower speed is increased to quickly determine smoke presence, then the detection time is reduced, but the ability to perform detailed particle analysis decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection timeVSAvoidparticle classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The blower operates in periodic cycles, alternating between high-speed detection mode and low-speed analysis mode. During high-speed phases, smoke is rapidly transported for quick detection. During low-speed phases, the system performs detailed particle classification and analysis, ensuring both rapid response and accurate measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The blower speed is dynamically adjusted based on the operational phase. High speed is used when rapid smoke presence determination is needed, while low speed is used when detailed particle classification is required, allowing the system to optimize for either speed or precision depending on current needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces detection time for smoke and dust classification, prolongs blower life, and decreases power consumption, enhancing the system's ability to differentiate between false alarms and actual fire conditions while optimizing battery capacity.

Implementation Method 1

A fan or blower is required to move the air toward the detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 2

use a highly sensitive central detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

A sensor detects a concentration of airborne particulate matter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8098166B2Variable air speed aspirating smoke detector
Publication Date: 2012.01.17 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US8098166B2 patent drawing
  • US8098166B2 patent drawing
  • US8098166B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aspirated smoke detector includes a smoke sensor, an aspirator and variable speed control circuits. As the concentration of smoke increases, the speed control circuits can increase aspirator speed from a first, nominal value to a second, higher value.