Variable Stator Blade Profile Optimization for Turbomachine Flow Loss Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing turbomachines face inefficiencies due to pronounced radial gaps between blading and casing, leading to significant flow losses, particularly in variable stators where rotary bases are not positioned far enough upstream, and current solutions fail to provide effective aerodynamic improvements.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of variable stator blades with defined profile skeleton lines along the blade height, specifically in peripheral and mid zones, to combine profile front load with peripheral load distribution, optimizing flow steadiness and reducing gap effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If rotary bases are positioned as far upstream as possible to minimize radial gaps, then flow losses are reduced, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow lossesVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is divided into multiple zones (root zone, mid zone, tip zone) with different skeleton line types assigned to each. The root zone uses a first skeleton line type optimized for handling radial gaps and flow separation, while the tip zone uses a second skeleton line type optimized for aerodynamic performance. This localized differentiation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific flow conditions without compromising the entire blade design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The blade is segmented into distinct functional zones along its height, with each zone having a specialized skeleton line configuration. The root zone is segmented to address the challenging radial gap conditions, while the mid and tip zones are segmented to optimize for different flow characteristics. This segmentation enables targeted aerodynamic optimization without requiring complete redesign of the entire blade.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If uniform skeleton line type is used throughout the blade, then manufacturing is simplified, but peripheral flow efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidperipheral flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Different skeleton line types are assigned to different blade zones based on local flow requirements. The root zone uses a skeleton line type that addresses radial gap effects, while the tip zone uses a skeleton line type that optimizes peripheral flow. This local differentiation maximizes aerodynamic efficiency while maintaining manageable manufacturing complexity through standardized zone definitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Weight of moving object

If blade count is reduced to lower cost and weight, then manufacturing cost and weight decrease, but performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the aerodynamic parameters of existing blades by changing the skeleton line configuration across different zones. By carefully selecting and transitioning between different skeleton line types along the blade height, the design maximizes the performance contribution of each blade, thereby reducing the total number of blades required while maintaining or improving overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7416382B2Turbomachine with variable stator
Publication Date: 2008.08.26 ROLLS ROYCE DEUT LTD & CO KG
  • US7416382B2 patent drawing
  • US7416382B2 patent drawing
  • US7416382B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variable stator of a turbomachine with a profile skeleton line extending along a meridional flow line, with the stator being radially divided into at least three zones (Z0, Z1, Z2) and with the respective radial inner and the radial outer profile skeleton line of each zone (Z0, Z1, Z2) being designed such that it satisfies the following equations:α*=α1-αPα1-α2S*=SPSwhere:P is any point of the profile skeleton line,α1 is the angle of inclination at the stator leading edge,α2 is the angle of inclination at the stator trailing edge,α* is the dimensionless, specific angle of the total curvature,S* is the dimensionless, specific extension,αP is the angle of the tangent at any point P of the profile skeleton line to the central meridional flow line,sP is the extension of the profile skeleton line at any point P, andS is the total extension of the profile skeleton line.