Variable Steering Torque Control for Driver Assistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver assistance systems face challenges in accurately recognizing hazardous situations, leading to either inappropriate corrective steering torque applications or sluggish responses, which can irritate the driver or result in loss of control.

Innovation Solution

A driver assistance system that utilizes multiple sensors to differentiate between lower and higher reliability situations, applying a variable steering torque based on reliability to provide a controlled and timely corrective steering input, ensuring driver safety and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the system applies full steering torque immediately upon recognizing a hazardous situation, then the response speed is improved, but the driver may feel sudden strong steering torque that irritates the driver or causes the steering wheel to slip away

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the steering torque based on reliability determination. When a hazardous situation is recognized with high reliability, the full corrective steering torque is applied immediately. When reliability is low or uncertain, the system applies a softened, limited torque that increases gradually, preventing driver irritation while maintaining readiness for full correction when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of steering torque magnitude based on the reliability of hazard recognition. The control unit adjusts the torque parameter dynamically: applying full torque when reliability is high, and applying limited/softened torque when reliability is low, thus optimizing both response speed and driver comfort according to the situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the system limits the corrective steering torque to prevent driver irritation, then the driver comfort is improved, but the full steering torque is not available promptly when needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver comfortVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between limited torque mode and full torque mode based on reliability assessment. Initially, when hazard recognition reliability is low, the system applies limited torque for comfort. When reliability increases to a high level, the system dynamically transitions to full torque application, ensuring both comfort during uncertainty and rapid full response when confidence is high.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary hazard assessment and begins applying limited corrective torque in advance while monitoring reliability. This preliminary action prepares the system for potential full torque application without waiting for complete certainty, thus maintaining driver comfort while being ready to provide full steering assistance when reliability confirms the hazard.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the system uses a single sensor for hazard recognition, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of recognizing hazardous situations decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system complexityVSAvoidhazard recognition reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple independent sensors (camera, radar, lidar, ultrasound) to recognize hazardous situations. By combining sensor inputs, the system achieves higher reliability in hazard detection and reliability determination, overcoming the limitations of single-sensor systems while managing complexity through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Speed

If the system applies corrective steering torque with low reliability recognition, then the response speed is improved, but incorrect recognitions lead to driving behavior that is unpleasant and unacceptable to the driver

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidrecognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts torque application strategy based on reliability levels. When recognition reliability is low, the system applies softened, limited torque that is less likely to cause driver irritation from incorrect recognitions. When reliability is high, the system applies full corrective torque for rapid response. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the steering torque parameter based on reliability assessment. For low-reliability recognitions, the torque parameter is reduced and softened to minimize unpleasant driver experiences from potential false positives. For high-reliability recognitions, the full torque parameter is applied to ensure rapid and effective corrective action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10399599B2Driver assistance system
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10399599B2 patent drawing
  • US10399599B2 patent drawing
  • US10399599B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driver assistance system for a motor vehicle configured to recognize an exceptional situation by querying at least one sensor and if necessary applying a corrective or applied steering torque to a steering wheel. The driver assistance system configured to differentiate between a lower reliability and a higher reliability and upon the recognition to set the steering torque depending on the reliability.