Variable Stiffness Backing Layer for Adhesion Force Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adhesion structures with fibrous surface projections suffer from nonuniform force distribution, leading to reduced adhesion efficiency and load-bearing capacity, especially when connected by an elastic backing layer and featuring convex curvature, causing detachment to initiate from the edge due to unequal loading.

Innovation Solution

A structure with a backing layer having varying stiffness, decreasing towards the edges, achieved through thickness gradients or layered regions with different elastic moduli, ensuring controlled adhesion and detachment with improved force distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a multiplicity of pillar-shaped projections are used for adhesion, then adhesion strength can be controlled, but nonuniform force distribution occurs leading to reduced adhesion efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion strengthVSAvoidadhesion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The backing layer is designed with spatially varying stiffness properties - softer at the edges and harder in the center - to create local quality differences that compensate for the unequal load distribution inherent in pillar arrays. This allows each region of the backing layer to provide appropriate support to the projections in that local area, improving overall adhesion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The stiffness parameter of the backing layer is systematically varied across its surface area. By changing the elastic modulus or thickness of the backing layer material as a function of position, the patent optimizes the mechanical coupling between projections at different locations, thereby improving force distribution and adhesion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If the backing layer has uniform stiffness, then manufacturing is simplified, but edge structures experience greater load leading to premature detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacking layer manufacturingVSAvoidadhesion reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The backing layer transitions from uniform to non-uniform stiffness distribution, with softer material at the edges and harder material in the center. This local quality variation compensates for the higher stress concentrations at edge locations, preventing premature detachment and improving overall adhesion reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The softer backing layer material at the edges acts as a cushion that absorbs and distributes the higher loads experienced by edge projections before these loads can cause detachment. This beforehand cushioning protects the vulnerable edge structures from failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the backing layer thickness is increased, then structural stability improves, but force distribution uniformity decreases due to enhanced mechanical coupling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidforce distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a uniformly thick backing layer, the patent employs a thickness gradient where the backing layer is thinner at the edges and thicker in the center. This local quality variation in thickness allows the structure to maintain overall stability while reducing the mechanical coupling that causes nonuniform force distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses the two-dimensional force distribution problem by introducing a third dimension - the thickness variation through the backing layer. By making the thickness a function of position (t(x,y)), the patent simultaneously achieves structural stability and improved force distribution uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure achieves enhanced adhesion and controlled detachment with improved local precision, allowing for efficient gripping and releasing of objects using smaller adhesion arrays, reducing edge effects and maintaining adhesion to flat surfaces.

Implementation Method 1

the stiffness of the backing layer varies, preferably decreases, in the direction of at least one edge of the structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

If a structured elastomer surface is pressed against a comparatively flat surface with a certain contact force, van der Waals interactions can form

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectvan der Waals force: Van der Waals Force

Data Source

PatentUS11787982B2Structure with improved adhesion
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 INNOCISE GMBH
  • US11787982B2 patent drawing
  • US11787982B2 patent drawing
  • US11787982B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structure with improved adhesion includes projections and a backing layer, the rigidity of the backing layer being variable, and the end faces defining a common surface.