Variable-Stiffness Part Machining With Dynamic Chatter-Free Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machining flexible parts, such as airfoils, poses a challenge due to varying rigidity during the process, leading to vibrations and tool breakage, as traditional methods like the tap test are inefficient for parts with changing stiffness profiles.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a controller that determines a chatter-lobe plot for the cutting tool assembly, develops a preliminary tool path, performs virtual machining, and calculates a dynamic chatter-lobe plot to identify a chatter-free rotational speed profile, optimizing machining parameters to minimize vibrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional empirical methods like tap test are used for machining flexible parts, then the method is simple to implement, but it cannot accurately account for varying rigidity during the machining process, leading to chatter vibrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining stabilityVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary virtual machining simulations before actual machining to predict chatter vibrations and optimize cutting parameters. The controller calculates chatter-lobe plots and determines stable machining conditions in advance, allowing the actual machining process to proceed without chatter vibrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy of the workpiece and performs simulated machining on this digital model. The virtual machining simulation replicates the actual machining process to predict vibrations and optimize parameters, eliminating the need for repeated empirical testing on physical parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If machining parameters are optimized for rigid parts, then the process is efficient, but it causes excessive vibrations and tool breakage when applied to flexible parts with varying stiffness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining efficiencyVSAvoidtool life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts machining parameters based on the actual workpiece geometry and material removal process. The controller continuously updates chatter-lobe plots during virtual machining simulations to reflect changing rigidity conditions, enabling efficient machining while preventing tool breakage through real-time parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes cutting parameters such as spindle speed and depth of cut based on calculated chatter-lobe plots. By identifying stable machining zones where vibrations are minimized, the system optimizes productivity while extending tool life through parameter adjustments tailored to flexible part characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If repeated empirical data collection is performed to account for rigidity changes, then accurate machining parameters can be obtained, but the process time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigidity measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces physical empirical testing with computational simulations. The controller uses finite element analysis and chatter-lobe calculations to predict vibrations and determine optimal machining parameters, eliminating the need for repeated physical tap tests and empirical data collection while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a virtual model of the workpiece to perform repeated simulations and data collection. This digital copy allows unlimited virtual testing and parameter optimization without consuming physical material or requiring actual machining trials, significantly reducing time loss while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11090772B2Method and apparatus for machining parts with variable stiffness
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 RTX CORP
  • US11090772B2 patent drawing
  • US11090772B2 patent drawing
  • US11090772B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for machining parts with variable stiffness includes determining, by a controller, a chatter-lobe plot of a cutter assembly. A preliminary tool path is developed by the controller. Virtual machining of a blank part using the preliminary tool path is performed by the controller. A chatter-lobe plot of the virtually machined part is determined by the controller. A dynamic chatter-lobe plot using the chatter-lobe plot of the cutting tool assembly and the chatter-lobe plot of the virtually machined part is determined by the controller. A chatter-free rotational speed of the cutting tool from the dynamic chatter-lobe plot is determined by the controller. A machining apparatus, controlled by the controller, uses the determined chatter-free rotational speed of the cutting tool to machine a blank part.