Variable-Stiffness Part Machining With Dynamic Chatter Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chatter vibrations during machining of flexible parts, such as airfoils, pose challenges due to varying rigidity, leading to poor surface quality and tool breakage, as existing methods like tap tests are inefficient for parts with changing stiffness profiles.

Innovation Solution

A machining method and apparatus that utilize modal analysis and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) software to determine dynamic chatter-lobe plots for each segment of a flexible part, optimizing spindle speed and tool path to minimize vibrations, replacing laborious empirical data collection techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If empirical tap test method is used for rigid parts, then machining stability can be achieved, but it becomes inefficient and inaccurate for flexible parts with varying rigidity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigidity measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static empirical tap tests to dynamic modal analysis that captures the time-varying rigidity characteristics of flexible parts during machining. The chatter-lobe plot is updated in real-time as material is removed, adapting to changing part stiffness without requiring repeated empirical measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical empirical tap test method with computational modal analysis using finite element models. This substitution eliminates the need for physical tapping and manual data collection, automatically computing rigidity variations and their impact on machining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional chatter-lobe plots are used assuming constant rigidity, then simple machining control is achieved, but accuracy deteriorates for flexible parts where rigidity changes during machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidchatter-lobe plot complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machining process is divided into multiple segments or steps, with a separate chatter-lobe plot generated for each segment. This segmentation allows the system to capture rigidity changes at different stages of material removal while maintaining manageable computational complexity for each individual plot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chatter-lobe plot evolves from a static representation to a dynamic one that changes as machining progresses. The system computes updated chatter-lobe plots for subsequent segments based on the modified part geometry and rigidity, enabling accurate control throughout the machining process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If machining parameters are optimized for initial part rigidity, then tool life is extended initially, but vibrations increase as rigidity changes during material removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool lifeVSAvoidparameter adaptation to rigidity changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses modal analysis results as feedback to continuously update machining parameters. The computed rigidity changes and their impact on vibration are fed back into the chatter-lobe plot, which then guides adjustments to spindle speed, feed rate, and depth of cut to maintain optimal tool life throughout machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Machining parameters such as spindle speed, feed rate, and depth of cut are dynamically adjusted based on the computed chatter-lobe plot for each segment. This parameter adaptation ensures that the tool operates within stable vibration regions even as part rigidity changes during material removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3677972B1Method and apparatus for machining parts with variable stiffness
Publication Date: 2023.02.15 RTX CORP
  • EP3677972B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3677972B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3677972B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and apparatus (40;100) for machining parts with variable stiffness includes determining, by a controller (104), a chatter-lobe plot of a cutter assembly (44;102). A preliminary tool path is developed by the controller (104). Virtual machining of a blank part using the preliminary tool path is performed by the controller (104). A chatter-lobe plot of the virtually machined part is determined by the controller (104). A dynamic chatter-lobe plot using the chatter-lobe plot of the cutting tool assembly (44;102) and the chatter-lobe plot of the virtually machined part is determined by the controller (104). A chatter-free rotational speed of the cutting tool from the dynamic chatter-lobe plot is determined by the controller (104). A machining apparatus (40;100), controlled by the controller (104), uses the determined chatter-free rotational speed of the cutting tool to machine a blank part.