Variable-Stiffness Structure Using Hydraulic Jamming Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rigid structures with uniform stiffness are unable to adapt to changing loads, offering inadequate support under low loads and collapsing under higher loads due to their inability to vary mechanical properties such as malleability, flexibility, and rigidity.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a structure with variable stiffness characteristics utilizing one or more actuators that apply hydraulic force against jamming materials, allowing for controlled stiffness adjustment through electrical inputs, which can harden the structure in response to changing demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a rigid structure with uniform stiffness is used, then it can support high loads up to a maximum weight, but it cannot adapt to varying loads and may collapse under loads exceeding the maximum or be overly rigid under low loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying loadsVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structure transitions from a static rigid configuration to a dynamic system that can adjust its stiffness properties in real-time. The actuator actively modifies the mechanical properties of the structure, allowing it to adapt between rigid and flexible states based on load conditions, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameter of stiffness by introducing an actuator that can modify the mechanical properties of the structure. By altering the stiffness parameter dynamically, the structure can optimize its performance for different load conditions, enabling adaptability without requiring multiple separate structural configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If the structure is made rigid to support high loads, then it can withstand maximum weight, but it becomes unable to flex or adapt under lower loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidflexibility under varying loads
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The structure employs dynamic control through an actuator that can adjust the stiffness in real-time. This allows the structure to exhibit high strength when needed for maximum load support while transitioning to a more flexible state under lower loads, thereby simultaneously achieving both strength and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator modifies the stiffness parameter of the structure dynamically. By changing this physical parameter, the structure can optimize its load-bearing capacity for high loads while maintaining the ability to flex appropriately under lower loads, resolving the contradiction between strength and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the structure is made flexible to adapt to low loads, then it can maintain flexibility, but it collapses under higher loads exceeding its maximum weight capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility under low loadsVSAvoidmaximum load capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic actuator system enables the structure to switch between flexible and rigid states based on real-time load conditions. Under low loads, the structure remains flexible for adaptability, while under high loads, the actuator activates to increase stiffness and prevent collapse, thereby achieving both flexibility and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator dynamically adjusts the stiffness parameter of the structure. When loads are low, the structure maintains flexibility for adaptability. When loads approach the maximum capacity, the actuator increases the stiffness parameter to prevent collapse, thus resolving the contradiction between flexibility and maximum load capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If a uniform stiffness structure is used, then the design is simple, but it cannot respond to changing demands or varying load conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural design simplicityVSAvoidresponse to changing loads
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dynamic actuator component that enables the structure to respond to changing load conditions. While this adds some complexity to the design, it provides the necessary adaptability to vary stiffness in response to different demands, resolving the contradiction between design simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the structure to maintain stability and support across varying loads by dynamically adjusting its stiffness, preventing collapse under higher loads while maintaining flexibility under lower loads, thus enhancing its load-bearing capacity and safety.

Implementation Method 1

an actuator connected with an inner surface of the second plate and the jamming material, the soft hydraulic actuator configured to create a hydraulic force against the jamming material and the second plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic force: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

a jamming material attached to an inner surface of the first plate... configured to create a hydraulic force against the jamming material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJamming:

Data Source

PatentUS11548261B2Structure with selectively variable stiffness
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11548261B2 patent drawing
  • US11548261B2 patent drawing
  • US11548261B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stiffness control and systems for the same are disclosed herein. A first plate and a second plate can be connected with rigid support, a hydraulic actuator and a high roughness surface. Upon actuation, the actuator can force the high roughness surface against the first plate, thus increasing rigidity through hydraulic pressure against the first plate and the second plate. Thus, the stiffness of the surface can be altered in a variable and reversible fashion.