Variable Stiffness Noise Reducer for Wind Turbine Rotor Blades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing noise reducers for wind turbine rotor blades have constant stiffness serrations that impede noise reduction due to inadequate flexibility in response to wind flow, limiting their effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A noise reducer with variable stiffness noise reduction features, integrated with reinforcing members that allow for flexing during wind flow interaction, enhancing noise reduction performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If constant stiffness serrations are used in noise reducers, then manufacturing is simplified, but noise reduction effectiveness deteriorates due to inadequate flexibility in response to wind flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidnoise reduction effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the stiffness of different portions of the serrations. Specifically, the serrations are designed with different thicknesses along their length, creating regions of different stiffness. This allows the noise reducer to have both manufacturing simplicity and improved noise reduction effectiveness, as the variable stiffness enables better flexibility response to wind flow while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the physical dimensions of the serrations to create variable stiffness characteristics. The thickness of the serrations is varied along their length, changing the structural parameter from constant to variable. This parameter change allows the noise reducer to adapt to wind flow conditions more effectively, improving noise reduction performance while maintaining ease of manufacture through a systematic design approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If variable stiffness noise reduction features are implemented, then noise reduction effectiveness is improved through better wind flow response, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reduction effectivenessVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the complexity issue by applying local quality in a controlled manner. Instead of making the entire structure complex, only specific portions of the serrations are varied in thickness to create local stiffness differences. This localized approach achieves the desired flexibility and noise reduction effectiveness without requiring complex overall structural design, manufacturing processes, or assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent manages device complexity by implementing parameter changes in a systematic and manageable way. The thickness variation of serrations follows a defined pattern along the length of each serration, creating variable stiffness without requiring complex geometry. This approach achieves improved wind flow response and noise reduction while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing and assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The variable stiffness design improves the noise reduction capabilities of the noise reducer, leading to more effective noise reduction and increased efficiency of wind turbine rotor blades.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the plurality of reinforcing members causes the connected noise reduction feature to have a variable stiffness throughout at least a portion of the width of the connected noise reduction feature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVariable stiffness:

Implementation Method 2

This variable stiffness may allow the noise reduction feature to better flex in response to wind flow over the noise reducer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexing: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

better flex in response to wind flow over the noise reducer, thereby improving the noise reduction characteristics of the rotor blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWind flow interaction:

Implementation Method 4

noise reducers may be attached adjacent the trailing edges of the rotor blades to reduce the noise and increase the efficiency associated with the rotor blades

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNoise reduction: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentUS7976283B2Noise reducer for rotor blade in wind turbine
Publication Date: 2011.07.12 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US7976283B2 patent drawing
  • US7976283B2 patent drawing
  • US7976283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor blade assembly for a wind turbine is disclosed. The rotor blade assembly includes a rotor blade having surfaces defining a pressure side, a suction side, a leading edge, and a trailing edge extending between a tip and a root. The rotor blade assembly further includes a noise reducer configured on a surface of the rotor blade. The noise reducer includes a plurality of reinforcing members and a plurality of noise reduction features. Each of the plurality of reinforcing members extends outwardly with respect to the rotor blade. Each of the plurality of noise reduction features is connected to one of the plurality of reinforcing members and defines a width. Each of the plurality of reinforcing members causes the connected noise reduction feature to have a variable stiffness throughout at least a portion of the width of the connected noise reduction feature.