Variable Stiffness Transcutaneous Sensor Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional transcutaneous analyte sensors face challenges with motion artifacts due to host movement, leading to mechanical stresses and signal artifacts, as they lack variable stiffness configurations that could accommodate different mechanical demands along the device.

Innovation Solution

A transcutaneous analyte sensor with a variable stiffness design, featuring a distal portion that is more flexible than the proximal portion, achieved through a helical configuration with varying pitch, cross-section, or hardness, allowing for enhanced flexibility in stress-prone areas and increased stiffness for structural integrity and reliable connections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the sensor is made uniformly flexible throughout, then the sensor can accommodate host movement, but the sensor loses structural integrity and connection stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility to accommodate host movementVSAvoidstructural integrity and connection stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor is designed with non-uniform stiffness distribution along its length. The distal portion (inserted in host tissue) is made more flexible to accommodate host movement, while the proximal portion (external connection portion) is made stiffer to maintain structural integrity and connection stability. This local differentiation of mechanical properties resolves the contradiction between flexibility and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the sensor is made uniformly stiff throughout, then the sensor maintains structural integrity, but the sensor experiences mechanical stresses and signal artifacts from host movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmechanical stresses and signal artifacts from host movement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor implements variable stiffness along its length, with the distal portion being more flexible to absorb mechanical stresses from host movement and the proximal portion being stiffer to maintain structural integrity. This local differentiation reduces signal artifacts while preserving overall structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the sensor uses variable stiffness configuration, then the sensor minimizes mechanical stresses, but the sensor design becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stresses from host movementVSAvoidsensor design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor achieves variable stiffness by changing the physical parameters of the sensor body along its length. This can be accomplished through varying the cross-sectional area, wall thickness, or material properties at different positions. This parameter-based approach provides the needed flexibility gradient without requiring complex mechanical structures or multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8812072B2Transcutaneous medical device with variable stiffness
Publication Date: 2014.08.19 DEXCOM INC
  • US8812072B2 patent drawing
  • US8812072B2 patent drawing
  • US8812072B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates generally to variable stiffness transcutaneous medical devices including a distal portion designed to be more flexible than a proximal portion. The variable stiffness can be provided by a variable pitch in one or more wires of the device, a variable cross-section in one or more wires of the device, and/or a variable hardening and/or softening in one or more wires of the device.