Insulation Fastener With Variable Thickness Ribs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fastening elements for insulating materials are inflexible and require precise manufacturing of openings, leading to high insertion forces when openings are too small or insufficient holding power when they are too large, limiting their adaptability to different sizes.

Innovation Solution

The fastening element features radially protruding ribs with a thickness that decreases in sections away from the shank, increasing flexibility while maintaining stability near the shaft, allowing better adaptation to varying opening sizes and forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the ribs are made stiff to provide sufficient holding power, then the holding force is improved, but the insertion force becomes very high when openings are too small

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidinsertion force
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The rib structure implements local quality by having different thicknesses at different locations: the base section adjacent to the shaft maintains greater thickness for stiffness and holding power, while the free end section has reduced thickness for flexibility and easier insertion. This spatial variation in structural properties allows the rib to simultaneously provide both insertion ease and holding strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rib is segmented into multiple sections with different thicknesses along its length from the shaft outward. This segmentation creates distinct functional zones: a stiffer base region for anchoring and a more flexible tip region for adaptation to opening variations, resolving the contradiction between holding force and insertion force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the opening diameter is reduced to increase holding power, then the holding force is improved, but the insertion force becomes very high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidinsertion force
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The rib thickness parameter is changed along its length, transitioning from a uniform thickness design to a variable thickness design. This parameter variation allows the rib to adapt to different opening diameters while maintaining adequate holding power, reducing the sensitivity to precise opening dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the ribs are made thicker to provide sufficient holding power, then the holding force is improved, but the flexibility of the ribs decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different sections of the rib have different thicknesses to provide locally optimized properties: the base section has greater thickness for strength and holding power, while the free end section has reduced thickness for flexibility and adaptability to different opening sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If the ribs are made more flexible to adapt to different opening sizes, then the adaptability is improved, but the holding power becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to opening sizesVSAvoidholding force
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The rib is divided into segments with different thicknesses: the base segment maintains sufficient thickness for holding power, while the free end segment has reduced thickness for flexibility. This segmentation allows the rib to simultaneously achieve both adaptability and holding strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables easier insertion and enhanced holding power by adapting to different opening sizes, reducing insertion force and increasing holding force as the fastener is inserted deeper, with adjustable rib thickness and configuration for optimal performance.

Implementation Method 1

the ribs are partially deformed or bent over, as a result of which the fastening element is clamped in the opening and is thus held in a frictionally engaged manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the thickness of at least one rib decreases at least in sections in the radial direction away from the shaft. Starting from the shank, the ribs thus become thinner in the radial direction, as a result of which the flexibility of the ribs increases in the radial direction away from the shank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric structure: Geometry

Data Source

PatentEP3004661B1Fastening element
Publication Date: 2017.12.20 HILTI AG
  • EP3004661B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3004661B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3004661B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The invention relates to a securing element (10) for insulating materials, especially for insulating boards, comprising a shaft (12) and a plate provided on a first end of the shaft (12), radially protruding, longitudinally (L) extending ribs (20) being provided on the second end (18) of the shaft opposite the plate. The thickness of at least one rib (20) decreases at least in some sections in the radial direction (R) away from the shaft (12).