Variable Threshold Re-ranking for Constrained Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing re-ranking systems face inefficiencies and inaccuracies in re-ranking documents due to the use of constant threshold values, which require excessive computational resources and fail to adapt to changing user interests and distributions of metrics, leading to suboptimal ranking and performance degradation.

Innovation Solution

A re-ranking system that employs a variable threshold function fitted to data distributions to optimize ranking scores, allowing for more efficient allocation of computational resources and improved ranking accuracy by using binary search to determine weight values based on actual metric values, thus adapting to changing user interests and document quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a constant threshold value is used to constrain re-ranking optimization, then the optimization process is simple to implement, but computational resources are excessively consumed and re-ranking efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidre-ranking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static constant threshold into a dynamic variable threshold that adapts to different document collections. The threshold is computed based on collection-specific metrics (e.g., average document quality, diversity measures) allowing the optimization process to adjust computational effort according to actual needs, thereby improving re-ranking efficiency without sacrificing implementation simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the threshold parameter from a fixed constant to a variable that depends on collection characteristics. By computing the threshold as a function of collection metrics (such as quality scores, diversity indices), the system optimizes computational resource allocation dynamically, reducing unnecessary computations for high-quality collections while maintaining thorough optimization for lower-quality collections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a constant threshold value is used for all document collections, then the system is easy to operate, but ranking accuracy deteriorates due to inability to adapt to changing user interests and document distributions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operabilityVSAvoidranking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the threshold parameter to vary based on collection characteristics such as document quality distribution, diversity metrics, and user interaction patterns. This allows the system to maintain ease of operation (single threshold mechanism) while achieving adaptability through data-driven threshold computation, thereby improving ranking accuracy without complicating system operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where threshold values are computed based on actual collection metrics and user interactions. The system continuously monitors document quality scores, user engagement patterns, and collection characteristics to dynamically adjust thresholds, ensuring ranking accuracy adapts to changing user interests and document distributions while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If computational resources are allocated uniformly to all document collections, then resource allocation is simple, but overall system productivity deteriorates due to wasted resources on high-quality collections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation simplicityVSAvoidoverall system throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different threshold levels to different document collections based on their specific characteristics. High-quality collections receive lower thresholds (requiring fewer computational swaps), while lower-quality collections receive higher thresholds (allowing more extensive optimization). This local differentiation optimizes overall system throughput without complicating resource allocation mechanics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial optimization action to high-quality collections (using lower thresholds that require fewer computational resources) and excessive optimization action to lower-quality collections (using higher thresholds that allow more extensive re-ranking). This differential application of optimization effort maximizes overall system productivity by avoiding wasted computation on already high-quality collections while ensuring thorough optimization of lower-quality collections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11675855B2Variable thresholds in constrained optimization
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US11675855B2 patent drawing
  • US11675855B2 patent drawing
  • US11675855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for re-ranking a collection of documents according to a first metric and subject to a constraint on a function of one or more second metrics. One of the methods includes: obtaining, for each document in the first collection of documents, a respective first metric value corresponding to the first metric and respective one or more second metric values corresponding to the one or more second metrics; re-ranking the first collection of documents, comprising: determining the constraint on the function of one or more second metrics by computing a first threshold value using a variable threshold function that takes as input second metric values for the documents in the first collection of documents; and determining the re-ranking for the first collection of documents by solving a constrained optimization for the first metric constrained by the first threshold value.