Computational Model for Variable Time Delay Estimation in Sensorimotor Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current time-delay estimation techniques are inadequate for simulating biological sensorimotor control systems, which experience variability, nonlinearity, and uncertainty, and lack predictive capabilities for compensating delays in motor control.

Innovation Solution

A computational model that estimates variable time delays and predicts sensory states in real-time, using a time-delay estimator circuit and state predictor to simulate the brain's ability to compensate for delays, as demonstrated in the horizontal Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current time-delay estimation techniques are used, then linear systems with constant or random time delays can be analyzed, but biological sensorimotor systems with variability, nonlinearity, and uncertainty cannot be accurately simulated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to biological systemsVSAvoidaccuracy of delay estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static or simple random delay models to dynamic time-varying delay models that capture the nonlinearity and variability of biological sensorimotor systems. The computational model estimates time delays that change over time rather than remaining constant, allowing accurate representation of physiological conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the delay estimation approach by moving from fixed or statistically simple delay parameters to time-varying, state-dependent delay parameters. This allows the model to adapt to changing system conditions and accurately represent the complex behavior of biological systems under various input conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If traditional delay estimation methods are applied, then past or current delay values can be determined, but future sensory states cannot be predicted for compensating delays in motor control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay measurement accuracyVSAvoidpredictive capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting future sensory states before the actual motor output occurs. The computational model uses current and past state information to estimate what the sensory state will be in the future, allowing the system to compensate for delays proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the predicted future sensory states to adjust and optimize motor control commands. The model continuously compares predicted states with actual states and uses this information to refine delay compensation strategies, creating a closed-loop predictive control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex Hilbert-Huang Transform-based methods are used for delay estimation, then practical applicability to motor control improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepractical applicabilityVSAvoidcomputational process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential delay estimation function from complex transform methods and implements it through a streamlined computational model. By focusing on the core functionality of estimating time-varying delays and predicting states, the model achieves practical applicability without the excessive computational burden of full Hilbert-Huang Transform implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10349859B2Simulation and diagnostic tool for sensorimotor diseases
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
  • US10349859B2 patent drawing
  • US10349859B2 patent drawing
  • US10349859B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computational models and methods and systems of using the model to estimate variable time delay in the sensorimotor system of a subject are provided. The computational model can estimate variable time delays in the sensorimotor system, predict sensory states based on delayed sensory feedback, and/or control the system in real time. The subject can be a human or a primate. Simulation experiments can show how the model can explain a sensorimotor system's ability to compensate for delays during online learning and control.