Variable Timing Backlight for VR Display Motion Blur Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Display motion blur in virtual reality headsets disrupts immersive experiences due to slow pixel response times, leading to undesirable tradeoffs between frame rates, resolution, and display fidelity.

Innovation Solution

A system that intermittently illuminates the display with a variable timing backlight, determining a field of interest within each frame to ensure the backlight illuminates only after the display response time has passed and before the field of interest is modified, thereby reducing motion blur and allowing higher frame rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the backlight illuminates the display continuously or with fixed timing, then the display is visible, but motion blur occurs due to slow pixel response times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion blurVSAvoiddisplay fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the backlight timing adaptive rather than fixed. The system dynamically adjusts the backlight illumination timing based on the actual pixel response time measured for each field of interest. This allows the backlight to illuminate only after pixels have fully responded, eliminating motion blur while maintaining display fidelity. The dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by making the system responsive to actual display conditions rather than using static timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by measuring the actual pixel response time and using this information to control backlight timing. The system monitors how long pixels take to transition and adjusts the backlight illumination schedule accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that the backlight never illuminates during pixel transitions, eliminating motion blur while preserving display quality. The feedback mechanism directly addresses the contradiction by using measured performance data to optimize illumination timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the backlight waits for pixel response time to pass before illuminating, then motion blur is reduced, but frame rate and timing flexibility are constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion blurVSAvoidframe rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamics to adapt backlight timing to actual pixel response characteristics rather than using fixed conservative timing. By measuring the true response time and adjusting illumination accordingly, the system can operate at higher frame rates without introducing motion blur. The dynamic timing optimization resolves the contradiction by eliminating unnecessary timing constraints while maintaining blur-free display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting the backlight illumination timing parameter based on measured pixel response characteristics. Instead of using a fixed timing parameter that constrains frame rate, the system changes the timing parameter dynamically based on actual display performance. This allows the system to achieve higher frame rates while maintaining the blur-reduction benefit, resolving the contradiction between motion blur reduction and frame rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If pixel response time is reduced, then motion blur decreases, but display resolution and fidelity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion blurVSAvoiddisplay fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the motion blur problem from its cause by separating the pixel response time characteristic from the illumination timing. Instead of trying to reduce pixel response time (which may compromise display fidelity), the system extracts the timing information and uses it to control when illumination occurs. This allows motion blur to be eliminated through timing control rather than pixel speed improvement, preserving display fidelity while removing the harmful effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary measurement and control system between the pixel array and backlight. Rather than directly modifying pixel response characteristics, the system uses an intermediary feedback mechanism to measure response time and mediate the backlight timing accordingly. This intermediary approach allows motion blur reduction without compromising pixel quality or display fidelity, as the pixels themselves are not modified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional displays turn off backlight during pixel transitions, then motion blur is reduced, but insufficient time remains for backlight on between frames at high frame rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion blurVSAvoidbacklight illumination duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making backlight timing adaptive rather than using fixed on/off schedules. Instead of turning off the backlight for fixed durations during transitions, the system dynamically determines illumination timing based on measured pixel response time. This allows the backlight to remain on longer when pixels respond quickly and turn off longer when response time is extended, optimizing both blur reduction and illumination duration for high frame rate operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to adjust backlight illumination duration and timing based on measured display characteristics. Rather than using fixed timing parameters that create insufficient on-time at high frame rates, the system changes the illumination parameters dynamically based on actual pixel response measurements. This allows optimal balancing of blur reduction and adequate illumination duration even at high frame rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10209523B1Apparatus, system, and method for blur reduction for head-mounted displays
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US10209523B1 patent drawing
  • US10209523B1 patent drawing
  • US10209523B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for reduced display blur may include a display that displays consecutive frames. The apparatus may also include a backlight that intermittently illuminates the display, with variable timing, to render visible each of the consecutive frames. The apparatus may further include a prioritization element that, for each given frame within the consecutive frames, determines a field of interest within the display. The apparatus may additionally include a control element that, for each given frame within the consecutive frames and responsive to the field of interest determined by the prioritization element for the given frame, controls the timing with which the backlight illuminates the display such that the backlight illuminates the display after the display response time has passed for the field of interest within the display for the given frame and finishes illuminating the display before the field of interest within the display is modified for a subsequent frame.