Variable Track Width Mechanism for Agricultural Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural application machines with fixed track widths face limitations in flexibility, leading to crop damage and reduced output when operating on fields with varying tram line widths, as they cannot adjust their track width to match different tram line configurations, necessitating multiple contractors and increased operational inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a variable track width mechanism using slidably mounted bearing blocks and hydraulic actuators allows for adjustable wheel separation, minimizing friction and reducing the number of components, enabling the machine to adapt to different tram line widths with ease and reduced maintenance costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed track width machine is used, then the structure is simple, but the adaptability to different tram line widths is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different tram line widthsVSAvoidtrack width adjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic track width adjustment mechanism where the wheel support structure can change its transverse separation distance. The support legs are designed to be movable relative to the chassis, allowing the track width to be adjusted from a first distance to a second distance. This dynamic capability enables the machine to adapt to different tram line widths while maintaining operational stability through the pivotable connection between support legs and wheel assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If traditional track width adjustment mechanisms are used, then the track width can be varied, but the frictional resistance is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of track width adjustmentVSAvoidfrictional resistance during adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a hydraulic actuator to drive the track width adjustment mechanism. The hydraulic cylinder connects the wheel support structure to the chassis and provides powered movement of the support legs relative to the chassis. This hydraulic actuation system overcomes high frictional resistance in the pivot joints and sliding surfaces, enabling smooth and easy track width adjustment without excessive manual force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple components are used for track width adjustment, then the adjustment capability is achieved, but the manufacturing cost and maintenance cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack width adjustment capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing and maintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the support legs to serve multiple functions: they provide structural support for the wheels, enable track width adjustment through relative movement, and connect the wheel assembly to the chassis via pivotable joints. The hydraulic cylinder also serves dual purposes by both actuating the adjustment mechanism and providing structural linkage. This multi-functionality reduces the total number of separate components needed, thereby lowering manufacturing and maintenance costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the support leg and wheel assembly into an integrated unit where the support leg is pivotally connected to both the chassis and the wheel assembly. This combined structure eliminates the need for separate mounting brackets, connection plates, and fastening mechanisms that would otherwise be required. The hydraulic cylinder is also integrated directly into the support leg structure, further reducing component count and simplifying the overall adjustment mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides greater flexibility and reduces crop damage by allowing the machine to operate on various tram line widths, increasing operational efficiency and reducing the need for multiple contractors, while maintaining a rigid structure and minimizing turning circles.

Implementation Method 1

During adjustment of the track width the sliding friction is only exerted between the bearing block sleeve and the transverse support shaft. Using known bearing technology this sliding friction is significantly reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSliding friction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the application machine may further comprise a respective hydraulic actuator connected between each wheel support structure and the chassis to apply a force therebetween to assist in varying the transverse separation of the wheels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic force: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentEP2328395B1Agricultural application machine with variable width track
Publication Date: 2018.02.28 AGCO NETHERLANDS
  • EP2328395B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2328395B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2328395B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

An agricultural application machine (10) comprising a pair of wheels (11,12) each having an associated wheel support structure (22) is provided. Each wheel support structure is mounted to the chassis (60) by a transversely extending support shaft (29;49) which is slidably mounted within a bearing block (27;47). The provision of bearing blocks allows the transverse separation of the wheels to be varied with minimal sliding friction.