Variable Track Width Shingled Recording for Density and Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional magnetic recording technologies face limitations in increasing data storage density due to the superparamagnetic limit, and existing solutions like shingled recording suffer from performance penalties during random writes, necessitating a more efficient approach to enhance areal density without major design changes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of shingled recording systems that write tracks overlapping each other, allowing for narrower tracks and increased areal density by using tiered storage and adaptive read architectures that process signals from multiple tracks jointly, thereby reducing the direct relationship between track pitch and write-head or read-head profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If shingled recording is used to increase areal density, then track density increases, but random write performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveareal densityVSAvoidrandom write performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the recording medium into distinct track width zones: narrow tracks for sequential data and wide tracks for random data. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific access pattern, resolving the contradiction by preventing random writes from degrading narrow track density while maintaining high areal density overall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the recording medium are assigned different track widths based on local quality requirements. Wide tracks are placed in regions where random access is needed, while narrow tracks are used for sequential storage, allowing each local region to have the optimal track width for its intended use case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If track width is reduced to increase track density, then areal density improves, but read signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack densityVSAvoidread signal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating wide-track zones where the larger track width compensates for potential signal degradation, ensuring adequate read signal-to-noise ratio in regions where it matters most, while narrow tracks in sequential-access zones maximize overall track density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional uniform track width is used, then manufacturing is simple, but areal density is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack uniformityVSAvoidareal density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The recording medium is segmented into multiple track width zones rather than using a uniform width throughout. This segmentation enables higher areal density by optimizing track width for different data types while remaining manufacturable through controlled writing processes that can accommodate variable track widths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9728223B2Storing random and sequential data on different track widths of a recording medium
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US9728223B2 patent drawing
  • US9728223B2 patent drawing
  • US9728223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Host data to be written to a recording medium is categorized as one of sequential data or random data. The sequential data is written to a first track width on the recording medium. The random data is written to a second track width on the recording medium, the second track width being larger than the first track width.