Variable TTI Bundling for FDD Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, particularly in LTE, the re-transmission of data due to errors caused by poor RF conditions leads to increased latency as the transmitter waits for HARQ responses, and conventional TTI bundling does not efficiently manage data transmission and acknowledgement processes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves variable bundle sizes and non-consecutive subframe transmissions with intervening subframes, allowing for early acknowledgement and cancellation of subsequent data transmissions, thereby reducing latency and resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data is re-transmitted multiple times until successful reception, then reliability of data transmission is improved, but latency increases due to waiting periods for HARQ responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The transmitter pre-determines a bundle size N and schedules N transmissions in advance with predetermined intervals, rather than waiting for HARQ responses between transmissions. This preliminary planning allows multiple transmission attempts to occur back-to-back without idle waiting periods, reducing latency while maintaining reliability through multiple redundancy opportunities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If TTI bundling transmits the same data four times in four consecutive TTIs, then robustness of data reception is improved, but latency is reduced only compared to individual transmissions with waiting periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reception robustnessVSAvoidtransmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The bundle size N is made variable rather than fixed at four transmissions. The transmitter can adapt N dynamically based on channel conditions, QoS requirements, and traffic patterns. This dynamic adjustment allows optimization between reliability and latency trade-offs, enabling smaller bundle sizes when latency is critical and larger bundle sizes when robustness is prioritized

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Duration of action of stationary object

If transmissions occur in consecutive subframes, then continuity of transmission is improved, but resource efficiency deteriorates due to inability to cancel unnecessary transmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission continuityVSAvoidchannel resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces feedback mechanisms where HARQ responses or scheduling grants received during the transmission sequence can trigger cancellation of remaining transmissions. This feedback-driven cancellation allows the system to maintain transmission continuity when needed while avoiding wasteful use of channel resources when data has already been successfully received or retransmission is no longer required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If bundle size N is increased for more transmission attempts, then reliability is improved, but channel resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission success rateVSAvoidchannel resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The bundle size N is changed from a fixed value to a variable parameter that can be adjusted based on channel quality indicators, historical transmission success rates, QoS requirements, and current network load. This parameter adaptation allows the system to use larger bundle sizes only when necessary for reliability while conserving channel resources during good channel conditions or when latency is critical

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9596071B1Enhanced TTI bundling in FDD mode
Publication Date: 2017.03.14 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US9596071B1 patent drawing
  • US9596071B1 patent drawing
  • US9596071B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A base station and a user equipment (UE) device may communicate over an air interface using a frequency division duplexing (FDD) configuration that provides a time sequence of consecutive subframes for both uplink and downlink communications. A transmitter (either the UE device or the base station) may select a sequence of N subframes for N transmissions of the same data to a receiver using transmission time interval (TTI) bundling, wherein successive subframes in the sequence are separated by one or more subframes. The transmitter may transmit the data M times (where M<N) and may receive an acknowledgement during the one or more subframes between subframe M and subframe M+1 in the sequence that the receiver has successfully received the data. In response to the acknowledgement, the transmitter may cancel transmission of the data in each subframe of the sequence occurring after subframe M.