Variable Turbine Vane Aft Rotation Axis Leakage Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Variable inlet guide vanes in gas turbines face significant aerodynamic losses due to leakage gaps between airfoils and end walls, which are exacerbated by high airfoil velocities and the structure of the turbine, where the spanwise height of the vane increases in the flow direction, leading to larger leakage areas and performance losses.
Innovation Solution
A turbine variable inlet guide vane assembly with a rotational axis located aft of the aerodynamic center of pressure, minimizing clearance gaps between the airfoil and large diameter end wall buttons, ensuring no gap forms at the trailing edge during movement, thus reducing leakage and enhancing performance.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If variable inlet guide vanes are used to control mass flow, then flow control capability is improved, but leakage gaps between airfoils and end walls increase causing aerodynamic losses
Solution Approach 1:
The rotation axis is positioned aft of the aerodynamic center of pressure, reversing the conventional arrangement. This inversion creates a trailing edge gap that prevents hot gas leakage from entering the button region, converting the potential harm of gaps into a beneficial sealing effect
Solution Approach 2:
The trailing edge gap, which would normally be harmful, is strategically positioned and sized to allow leakage flow to exit before reaching the button region. This converts the harmful leakage path into a controlled exit path that protects the button region from hot gas exposure
2Strength
If the spanwise height of the vane increases in the flow direction to accommodate turbine expansion, then structural integrity is improved, but leakage area increases leading to greater performance losses
Solution Approach 1:
The rotation axis is positioned aft of the aerodynamic center of pressure, reversing the conventional arrangement. This inversion creates a trailing edge gap that prevents hot gas leakage from entering the button region, converting the potential harm of gaps into a beneficial sealing effect
Solution Approach 2:
The airfoil and button structure are designed with specific local characteristics: the button diameter and position are optimized to create an effective seal, while the airfoil geometry is tailored to maintain structural integrity. The local gap geometry at the trailing edge is specifically designed to allow leakage exit while blocking access to the button region
3Force
If the rotation axis is placed through the aerodynamic center of pressure, then articulation forces are minimized, but trailing edge gaps form during vane movement causing leakage
Solution Approach 1:
The rotation axis is positioned aft of the aerodynamic center of pressure, reversing the conventional arrangement. This inversion creates a trailing edge gap that prevents hot gas leakage from entering the button region, converting the potential harm of gaps into a beneficial sealing effect
Solution Approach 2:
The trailing edge gap is pre-positioned at the optimal location before vane movement occurs. This preliminary positioning ensures that as the vane articulates through its range of motion, the gap consistently blocks the leakage path to the button region without requiring active control or adjustment during operation
Data Source
AI summary
A turbine with a variable inlet guide vane assembly in which the vane airfoils extend between inner and outer buttons, and in which a center of rotation of the airfoil is located aft of an aerodynamic center of pressure of the airfoil. The trailing edge of the airfoil extends into both of the buttons such that no gap is formed between the airfoil trailing edge region and a static part of the turbine during movement of the airfoil from an opened position to a closed position.


