Variable Valve Actuator Fixation Detection Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing variable valve actuation systems for internal combustion engines face challenges in promptly determining actuator movement fixation, especially when the movement position is unknown, leading to inefficiencies and potential false learning of reference positions.

Innovation Solution

A control method that sends two distinct movement commands, A and B, to determine actuator fixation by assessing movement responses, allowing for rapid fixation detection and enabling faster learning of reference positions to initiate valve characteristic control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the actuator is driven to determine fixation when movement position is unknown, then fixation detection can be performed, but the process requires driving to both high end and low end which consumes time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation detection accuracyVSAvoidtime for fixation determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by first driving the actuator to the high end to establish a reference position before performing fixation detection. This preliminary positioning action enables subsequent detection to be performed more efficiently without requiring full traversal to both ends, thus reducing time while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If the actuator movement range is mechanically restricted by stoppers, then the movement range is clearly defined, but false learning of reference positions may occur due to fixation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement range definitionVSAvoidreference position learning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the actuator's movement amount and comparing it against expected values during the learning process. When the actuator approaches the high end stopper, the system detects the movement amount and uses this feedback to confirm proper positioning. This feedback mechanism prevents false learning by verifying that the actuator actually reached the intended reference position rather than being stopped by fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the electronic control unit drives the actuator to learn reference positions, then the valve angle-of-action control can be initiated, but the process is delayed when fixation is present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve control initiation speedVSAvoidtime delay due to fixation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a quick assessment drive to the high end before initiating full reference position learning. This preliminary action serves two purposes: it establishes the high end reference position quickly and simultaneously checks for fixation. By combining these functions in a preliminary step, the system avoids time delays during the main learning process when fixation is present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8869759B2Control apparatus for variable valve actuation system and control method for variable valve actuation system
Publication Date: 2014.10.28 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US8869759B2 patent drawing
  • US8869759B2 patent drawing
  • US8869759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a variable valve actuation system capable of changing the angle of action of intake valves by using an actuator whose movement range is between a high end and a low end at which the movement of the actuator is mechanically stopped, it is determined that a fixation is present on condition that the actual amount of movement of the actuator in response to a command A for movement toward the low end that is issued when the present movement position of the actuator is unknown is not more than a prescribed movement criterion value a and that the actual amount of movement in response to a command B output subsequently to the command A in order to cause the actuator to operate in a direction opposite to the direction of the movement in response to the command B is not more than a prescribed movement criterion value b.