Variable-Wall Tubular Seat Frame for Strength-Weight Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional passenger seat frame components have a constant thickness, making them heavy, expensive, and limited in formability, failing to meet design requirements effectively.

Innovation Solution

A tubular frame component with variable wall thickness, where different portions have distinct thicknesses to accommodate varying stress conditions, allowing for increased formability and reduced weight while maintaining structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a constant thickness is used for the tubular frame component, then the structural strength and stiffness requirements are met, but the weight increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidframe weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The tubular frame component employs variable wall thickness where different sections have different thicknesses based on their specific structural requirements. High-stress areas have thicker walls for strength, while low-stress areas have thinner walls to reduce weight, optimizing the strength-to-weight ratio across the entire frame structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The wall thickness parameter of the tubular frame component is varied continuously or discontinuously along its length to match the stress distribution pattern. This parameter optimization allows the frame to maintain adequate strength where needed while minimizing material usage and weight in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If a constant thickness is used for the tubular frame component, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the formability is limited and design flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddesign formability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The frame component is designed with locally varied thicknesses that correspond to specific functional requirements such as bending sections, connection points, and load-bearing areas. This local differentiation enables complex three-dimensional shapes and configurations that would be impossible with uniform thickness, while still maintaining manufacturability through modern forming techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If a constant thickness is used for the tubular frame component, then the material usage is uniform, but the cost increases and design requirements cannot be fully met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The wall thickness parameter is optimized to match the actual stress distribution and functional requirements of different frame sections. This results in reduced material consumption overall, lower manufacturing costs, and the ability to meet diverse design requirements through a single integrated component rather than requiring multiple parts or excessive material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11873105B2Frame component with variable wall thickness
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 ZODIAC SEATS US LLC
  • US11873105B2 patent drawing
  • US11873105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a frame component for a passenger seat assembly. The frame includes a tubular frame component having a first portion and a second portion. The bent portion bends the frame at a non-zero angle within a plane. The tubular frame component includes a variable inner diameter such that the first portion of the tubular frame component has a first wall thickness and the bent portion of the tubular frame component has a second wall thickness that is different from the first wall thickness.