Variable Width Person Support Deck Asynchronous Motor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adjustable person support systems lack efficient mechanisms for simultaneously altering the width of multiple deck sections to accommodate varying user needs, often requiring complex manual operations or synchronized motor control to maintain proper alignment and prevent interference.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a bed controller that independently controls first and second motors to alter the width of corresponding deck sections at different times, along with a manual release assembly for independent extension/retraction, ensuring proper alignment and user convenience through staggered movement and fluid supply system integration for mattress adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If synchronized motor control is used to alter the width of multiple deck sections, then proper alignment is maintained, but the system complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment of deck sectionsVSAvoidmotor control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bed frame is divided into multiple independently controllable deck sections, each with its own motor control. This segmentation allows each section to be adjusted independently while maintaining overall alignment, reducing the complexity of synchronized control by treating each section as a separate controllable unit rather than requiring complex coordination of all sections simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If manual release assembly is provided for independent extension/retraction, then user convenience is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenience in adjustmentVSAvoidmechanical assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual release assembly enables users to independently extend or retract deck sections without requiring complex automated control systems or assistance from others. The mechanism is designed to be操作简单 (easy to operate), allowing users to perform the adjustment themselves by simply operating the release assembly, thus improving ease of operation while keeping the mechanical structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If asynchronous motor operation is implemented for deck sections, then adjustment flexibility is improved, but coordination difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment flexibility of deck sectionsVSAvoidcoordination control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements asynchronous motor operation where each deck section can be adjusted independently at different times and speeds based on specific needs. The control system dynamically determines the adjustment sequence and timing for each section, allowing flexible adaptation to various user requirements while managing coordination through a centralized controller that sequences the asynchronous operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10799407B2Variable width person support system and control system therefor
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 HILL ROM SERVICES INC
  • US10799407B2 patent drawing
  • US10799407B2 patent drawing
  • US10799407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variable width support system includes an adjustable width person support apparatus (PSA), an adjustable width person support surface (PSS), and first and second controllers. The first controller controls a function of the PSA and receives a first input corresponding to a function of the PSA via a first user interface. The second controller controls a function of the PSS and: a) receives a second input corresponding to a function of the PSS via a second user interface when the first controller is not in communication with the second controller, and b) receives a third input corresponding to a function of the PSS via the first controller when the first controller is in communication with the second controller. The second controller controls a function of the PSS in accordance with the third input when the first controller is in communication with the second controller.