Variable Window CFAR Radar for Maritime Clutter Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional RADAR systems face challenges in distinguishing genuine targets from clutter, particularly in maritime settings where sea clutter exhibits dynamic and variable responses, leading to high false alarm rates and reduced detection performance.

Innovation Solution

A cognitive RADAR system with a dynamic Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) function that adjusts the detection threshold based on the variability of previous amplitude measurements, using a variable window length and adaptive false alarm rates to optimize performance in changing environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed detection threshold is used in conventional CFAR systems, then the system operates simply with fixed parameters, but the false alarm rate increases and detection performance deteriorates in dynamic maritime clutter environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performanceVSAvoidCFAR system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of the CFAR window length based on the degree of variability in clutter conditions. The system transitions from fixed to variable window lengths (e.g., 16, 32, or 64 cells) depending on whether clutter variability is high, medium, or low, allowing the detection threshold to adapt to changing maritime environments and reducing false alarms while maintaining detection performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the CFAR window length parameter dynamically based on measured clutter variability. By adjusting this key parameter (window length) according to environmental conditions, the system optimizes detection performance without requiring complete redesign of the CFAR architecture, thus improving reliability while controlling complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If a long CFAR window length is used, then the detection threshold is more stable in low variability conditions, but the system responds slowly to changing clutter conditions and increases false alarms in high variability environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection threshold stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to changing clutter
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the CFAR window length based on real-time assessment of clutter variability. When variability is low, a longer window (64 cells) provides stable threshold estimation. When variability is high, the window length reduces (to 16 or 32 cells) to quickly adapt to changing conditions, thus achieving both stability when needed and adaptability when required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the degree of variability in clutter returns and uses this feedback to adjust the CFAR window length. By comparing current clutter statistics against thresholds and adjusting the window parameter accordingly, the system achieves closed-loop adaptation that maintains both stability and responsiveness to environmental changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If a short CFAR window length is used, then the system responds quickly to changing clutter conditions, but the detection threshold becomes unstable and false alarm rate increases in low variability environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to changing clutterVSAvoiddetection threshold stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses short window lengths (16 or 32 cells) only when clutter variability is assessed as high, providing quick response to changing conditions. When variability is low, the system switches to longer window lengths (64 cells) to maintain stable threshold estimation, thus achieving both rapid response and stability as needed without compromising either parameter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If the CFAR window length is made variable based on clutter variability, then false alarm rate reduces significantly, but the system complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts only one key parameter (CFAR window length) based on clutter variability assessment, rather than redesigning the entire CFAR processing architecture. This single parameter change approach achieves significant false alarm reduction (up to 15dB as mentioned in the patent) while adding minimal processing complexity, as the variation involves selecting from a limited set of predefined window lengths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4303611A1Improvements in and relating to radars
Publication Date: 2024.01.10 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • EP4303611A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4303611A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4303611A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a RADAR system comprising a Constant False Alarm Rate, CFAR, function, wherein the CFAR function is arranged such that a detection threshold is determined at least partly on the basis of a window length which is of a variable length and the variable length is determined on the basis of a degree of variability in a first number of previous amplitude measurements of received signals.